Show us your SSD performance 2


  1. Posts : 925
    Windows 10 Pro
       #1521

    I think I may have static electricity my SSD, it's less then a year old Typically I'm extremely careful; there must have been static in me at the time
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #1522

    JerometheGiraff said:
    I think I may have static electricity my SSD, it's less then a year old Typically I'm extremely careful; there must have been static in me at the time
    doubtful it dissipates quickly. Ground yourself then touch the SSD. Of course if you did zap it earlier....

    What's it (not) doing?
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 1,045
    Win8/8.1,Win7-U64, Vista U64, uncounted Linux distor's
       #1523

    whs said:
    This is not a SSD but my new PNY USB3 stick. Not bad for a stick. And this one is even better - faster than some SSDs.
    I was surprised by the speed of the PNY. I picked one up on the Tiger sale, almost 3X as fast as the ADATA USB 3 sticks I have.

    ADATA test
    Show us your SSD performance 2-adata-pen-drive.png

    PNY test in same USB 3 port.
    Show us your SSD performance 2-pnytest.png
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 925
    Windows 10 Pro
       #1524

    Britton30 said:
    JerometheGiraff said:
    I think I may have static electricity my SSD, it's less then a year old Typically I'm extremely careful; there must have been static in me at the time
    doubtful it dissipates quickly. Ground yourself then touch the SSD. Of course if you did zap it earlier....

    What's it (not) doing?
    When the computer is on for a few hours, the monitor will shut off, the computer will make three beeps, and I will get an error code of 75. When I check the bios the drive that the computer should be booting from is placed in slot three and one of my other drive is in slot 1, simple re-arranging solves the problem, and the computer boots fine. As of recently, keeping the computer off for several hours, I don't have to change the boot order in the bios as all, very odd.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 26,869
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1525

    Your A Data is a whole lot faster than mine, maybe size matters.
    Show us your SSD performance 2-data-16.jpg
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 1,045
    Win8/8.1,Win7-U64, Vista U64, uncounted Linux distor's
       #1526

    essenbe said:
    Your A Data is a whole lot faster than mine, maybe size matters.
    Show us your SSD performance 2-data-16.jpg
    It could be the USB contoller, I have it running through a KingWin 1142A using a KingWin hot swap rack. It's the fastest USB I could find at the time.

    I wanted the best transfer speeds I could afford, I have a Atech Flash Pro-57U USB 3 card reader attached to the MB header. Even the class 4 SD cards picked up speed.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 87
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #1527



    Another benchmark; :) ; seems it gets better all the time.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 3,487
    Win 7 Pro x64/Win 10 Pro x64 dual boot
       #1528

    I have a Mushkin Chronos 120 Gb SSD and I just benchmarked it. Is this as pathetic as it looks?

    Show us your SSD performance 2-capture89.png

    It's a SATA III and I have SATA III ports on my MB, but I don't get near the performance that you guys do based on other benchmarks in this thread. It's like my machine is running in SATA 1.

    Weird!
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 26,869
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1529

    Mellon Head, I really have no idea. I assume from the info in AS SSD you are in AHCI mode using the AMD drivers. It says they are OK. My only suggestion would be to roll back to the MSAHCI driver and see if you get better performance. I assume you are connected to port 0 (or 1) whichever is the 1ST port on your motherboard. If not, maybe try that. I'm just throwing out ideas off the top of my head. Mushkin as I see it has rated the drive at 450 MB speed. However, I would suggest you test it in ATTO. I will bet you get better numbers, most likely much better. Sandforce controllers compress data as they write and is how they gain speed. AS SSD uses incompressible data for their tests, which any Sandforce SSD will show worse results. ATTO, does not use incompressible data and Sandforce controllers usually fare much better with that test. That is what I have seen with my older Vertex drive. I will score much better in ATTO than AS SSD.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 26,869
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1530

    Mellon Head, after saying all of that, I would have expected a higher score from your drive, but it is not a terrible score. It depends on what you are comparing it to. Compared to a mechanical hard drive it is great. I can show you an AS SSD of a WD1002FAEX, a 7200 RPM 1TB drive. It gets a score of 15 on AS SSD. I'll show it if you want to see it. So, your score is not so bad.
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07.
Find Us