New Processor/Motherboard bundle

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

  1. Posts : 2,606
    Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1
       #11

    Erick Aguilar said:
    I would not trust any source of information from anandtech to be honest. Not after they got severely fined for tampering with marketing information in favor of Intel.
    Interesting. Can you supply a link to the story on that?

    I've generally trusted Anand more than, say, Thomas Pabst an company. I'd be sorry to hear of payoffs that were so unambiguous that the legal system came into play.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 679
    Windows 7 professional X64
       #12

    bobkn said:
    Erick Aguilar said:
    I would not trust any source of information from anandtech to be honest. Not after they got severely fined for tampering with marketing information in favor of Intel.
    Interesting. Can you supply a link to the story on that?

    I've generally trusted Anand more than, say, Thomas Pabst an company. I'd be sorry to hear of payoffs that were so unambiguous that the legal system came into play.
    Yeah, me as well.
    If you could perform some research yourself I'd appreciated, sorry if that sounded rude. At the moment I am at work, and don't have much access to plenty of internet queries. Please bear with me.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 40
    Windows 8.1 64Bit
    Thread Starter
       #13




    Out of the 2 processors that are 119.99, what would you go for?
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 679
    Windows 7 professional X64
       #14

    If I had no choice whatsoever and a gun was put on my head?
    The FX. It hwas horrible core architecture, but it would handled games better than the i3
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 5,795
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
       #15

    bobkn said:
    Interesting. Can you supply a link to the story on that?
    I am not finding anything to online about it. I think he may have gotten his sites mixed up. Anandtech is one of the most respected and revered sites online, as well as [H]ardOCP...and they both make up the best of the enthusiast community. I thought Tom's Hardware was caught accepting payment and gifts in exchange for favorable reviews, but that would have been quite some time ago.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 2,606
    Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1
       #16

    DeaconFrost said:
    bobkn said:
    Interesting. Can you supply a link to the story on that?
    I am not finding anything to online about it. I think he may have gotten his sites mixed up. Anandtech is one of the most respected and revered sites online, as well as [H]ardOCP...and they both make up the best of the enthusiast community. I thought Tom's Hardware was caught accepting payment and gifts in exchange for favorable reviews, but that would have been quite some time ago.
    Yeah. I can put up with a lot of brand boosterism, but I tend to draw the line at slander. (Intentional or not.)

    CrisyNova may find this of interest:

    AMD FX-8350, FX-8320, FX-6300 and FX-4300: All Vishera Processors in One Review! - X-bit labs

    It confirms that the FX-4170 is similar in performance to an I3-3240, which is a little faster than an I3-3220. (3.4GHz for the 3240 vs. 3.3 for the 3220, or 3%; trivial difference.) Looks like the FX-4300 (Vishera) is a bit of a step backwards from the 4170 due to the halving of the L3 cache.

    Jeepers creepers, the prices in the UK. In the US (www.newegg.com), an FX-4170 goes for $125 (with free shipping). At the current exchange rate, that'd be £80. Add 20% VAT, and it's still £96. £119 seems ridiculous.
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09.
Find Us