SSD's on SATA II vs SATA III

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. Posts : 2,973
    Windows 7 Professional 64bit SP1
       #1

    SSD's on SATA II vs SATA III


    Here is an article I just read that has some awesome information in it. It compares a Samsung 840 Pro on a SATA III connection, and a SATA II connection, and to show you how much faster it is than a "normal" HDD, it tests a 10K RPM Velociraptor. They clearly say what numbers are important, and what numbers are just fluff. The tests also quantify how much faster an SSD is over a HDD. For all of you that aren't sold on the idea of an SSD, or don't know what the numbers mean.....do yourself a favor and spend a few minutes reading this article.

    Is A SATA 3Gb/s Platform Still Worth Upgrading With An SSD?
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 5,941
    Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
       #2

    kbrady1979 said:
    Here is an article I just read that has some awesome information in it. It compares a Samsung 840 Pro on a SATA III connection, and a SATA II connection, and to show you how much faster it is than a "normal" HDD, it tests a 10K RPM Velociraptor. They clearly say what numbers are important, and what numbers are just fluff. The tests also quantify how much faster an SSD is over a HDD. For all of you that aren't sold on the idea of an SSD, or don't know what the numbers mean.....do yourself a favor and spend a few minutes reading this article.

    Is A SATA 3Gb/s Platform Still Worth Upgrading With An SSD?
    Hi there
    Absolutely correct -- even if you have a SATA III 10,000 RPM Raptor HDD (and 99% of typical PC's out there won't have these) an SSD even on a SATA II port blows these away. A 10,000 RPM SATA III raptor isn't in any way a "Normal HDD". !!!

    The author of that article is one of the really few who actually know what he's on about - unlike the mouthings and Ramblings that come so called technical consultants / think tanks - particularly GARTNER who everybody thinks speaks prophet like truth --fine if you can put up with 99% pure Bovine Scatology.

    With the price of these now realistic and reliability perfectly good -- BUY YOURSELF at least one SSD ASAP -- you'll wonder why you ever took so long in making the switch.

    Incidentally the article is quite informative too that if you use spinners for most real world applications the difference between SATA II and SATA III isn't that shattering at all.

    Use cheap spinners for essentially Static Data --SSD's for OS, Application programs (execution files), scratch files for Photoshop etc and work spaces for DB queries etc.

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 5,915
    Windows 10 Pro X64
       #3

    Nice post Kelly, I read all the SSD post now as I await the arrival of mine. Jimbo I wonder why I took so long to make the switch, pretty sure I will be amazed.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 24,479
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64 SP1
       #4

    What held me back was the extreme expense which isn't so bad now. I can now buy two 64GB SSDs for what I paid for my first one.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 3,133
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP 1
       #5

    Thanks for posting this Kelly. It was well worth the read.
      My Computer


  6. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #6

    Measurements are always interesting and sometimes impressive. The real world though is a bit different.

    The enormous OS performance boost you get from a SSD is mostly due to the fast random access time (typically 0.1ms versus an average of 15ms on a HDD). The OS does relatively few R/W operations and those are random and mostly in small 4K blocks. The access time in Sata II and Sata III are the same. They differ only in maximum transfer speeds.

    But if you look at the tranfer speeds of 4K blocks even an OCZ Vector, which is one of the fastest today, is only around 300.000MB/sec which is well within the capability of a Sata II port (3Gb/sec). The odd larger blocks would be faster than the Sata II port can handle. So those would be bottlenecked.

    The situation is, of course, different if you use the SSD for storing data that comes in large blocks. Then the Sata III capabilities (6Gb/sec) will be fully used. The large blocks on the Vector can run as high as 600.000MB/sec.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 2,973
    Windows 7 Professional 64bit SP1
    Thread Starter
       #7

    I'm glad you guys found it interesting and informative. As whs said, and I have agreed with time and time again, the specs that manufacturers advertise are almost worthless for what we use SSD's for. The real world performance comes from Random 4K Read/Write(Queue Depth 1) numbers, and access times that are a fraction of even the fastest mechanical drives. Installing Windows and applications, unzipping and extracting files, and opening up programs are much faster due to those two factors. Those are the real world factors, and no hard drive comes close to an SSD when dealing with them.

    Also, like Gary said, SSD's are so much more affordable now. My first SSD was the Intel X25-M 120GB gen 2 model. I had been wanting one for quite awhile, but gen 1 drives were still expensive, and too unreliable for my tastes. Then gen 2 drives came out, and I watched the Intel 120gb slowly drop from $280 to a tad over $200 and I snatched one up. Rock solid, and a hell of a performer.......and I was hooked. I only moved to the Samsung 830 when I built my new rig. I could have bought 2 of the Samsung 830 128gb SSD's for what I gave for my first Intel model!
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 5,941
    Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
       #8

    kbrady1979 said:
    I'm glad you guys found it interesting and informative. As whs said, and I have agreed with time and time again, the specs that manufacturers advertise are almost worthless for what we use SSD's for. The real world performance comes from Random 4K Read/Write(Queue Depth 1) numbers, and access times that are a fraction of even the fastest mechanical drives. Installing Windows and applications, unzipping and extracting files, and opening up programs are much faster due to those two factors. Those are the real world factors, and no hard drive comes close to an SSD when dealing with them.

    Also, like Gary said, SSD's are so much more affordable now. My first SSD was the Intel X25-M 120GB gen 2 model. I had been wanting one for quite awhile, but gen 1 drives were still expensive, and too unreliable for my tastes. Then gen 2 drives came out, and I watched the Intel 120gb slowly drop from $280 to a tad over $200 and I snatched one up. Rock solid, and a hell of a performer.......and I was hooked. I only moved to the Samsung 830 when I built my new rig. I could have bought 2 of the Samsung 830 128gb SSD's for what I gave for my first Intel model!
    Hi there
    The Samsung 840 256 GB models (almost a step order faster than the excellent 830 series) are about the same price as the 830 120 GB models of last year and even a 512 GB model is out now for around 390 USD. Ok 390 USD isn't as cheap as a spinner but a few years ago a fast 512 GB SSD would have cost around 800 USD even if you could find one.

    It won't be long now before we could replace ALL our spinners -- we aren't there quite yet but it won't be long.

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 6,075
    Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
       #9

    A great article Kelly, thanks for sharing.

    And yes prices are really coming down, I paid £130 for a 60GB Corsair F60 when SSD's were pretty new, my 2nd SSD was a 64GB Crucial M4 for £72 and my 3rd was a 128GB Vertex 4 for £90.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 2,497
    Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
       #10

    Another advantage of SSD drives is the much greater resistance to mechanical shock. This is of particular importance for laptops and external drives, both of which tend to receive occasional rough treatment. Many a laptop HD has been seriously damaged by what was thought to be a minor fall. The apparent ruggedness of conventional drives tends to hide the fact that they are really quite fragile internally, particularly while running.

    Be very sure you have a backup of all important files on an SSD. Many people never consider making a backup until a drive makes unusual noises or there are other warning signs. SSD drives tend to fail without warning and often with no apparent cause. Commercial data recovery is expensive for conventional drives but is even more so for SSDs.

    There can be little doubt that SSDs will eventually replace conventional drives but there are many technical hurdles that must be overcome before that day arrives. Improved manufacturing techniques and higher sales will bring up capacity and reliability at a lower cost. Just as happened with conventional drives.
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:52.
Find Us