FX-8320 vs 8350

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. Posts : 679
    Windows 7 professional X64
       #1

    FX-8320 vs 8350


    Hey guys, quick question here.

    I want to have a definitive system that will last me for some 4 to 5 years without problems.

    I currently have the system in my specs, and was thinking about moving up to the FX family for AMD.
    My store currently has the 8320 on sale for 155 dollars and the 8350 for 239 dollars (outside of the U.S., we deal with higher prices). I am also planning to pair the CPU up with an ASUS sabertooth motherboard or a GA-990FXA-UD3 motherboard.

    My question is if the difference in price would justify purchasing the 8350 instead, or if it would be performace/money effective to buy the 8320 and overclock it to the 8350 base clock?

    It is a computer that can be used for gaming, but also media activities and such.

      My Computer


  2. Posts : 11,424
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64
       #2

    Well in the previous series which I own and run in one rig the answer is no, the better value then was the 8120 vs the 8150 as both would over clock to a very similar stability if that's your goal. If you don't want to wring out all it can offer with beastly cooling and voltage then save and go for the 50.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 1,045
    Win8/8.1,Win7-U64, Vista U64, uncounted Linux distor's
       #3

    Both those chips may have the same OC capability, at least very close. I have the 8350 plugged into a GA-990FXA-UD3, it's stable at 4.6ghz. If you plan on more than two sticks of memory do your homework. The AMD memory controller has memory speed limitations when running more than two sticks. I have four sticks of 1866 but it defaults to 1366. I've managed to OC to a bit over 1400.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,269
    Windows 7 Ultimate Retail Box (64-bit installed) + Service Pack 1
       #4

    Hey Erick, once I realized you were replacing the mobo too.... LOL!

    FM2 vs AM3+ fun times.

    What's wrong with the A-10 performance?

    I continue to avoid overclocking... I doubt the difference is worth it between the 2 and would go with the FX-8320 in your shoes, but the new Intel did just come out <scratches head>.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 679
    Windows 7 professional X64
    Thread Starter
       #5

    Faladu said:
    Hey Erick, once I realized you were replacing the mobo too.... LOL!

    FM2 vs AM3+ fun times.

    What's wrong with the A-10 performance?

    I continue to avoid overclocking... I doubt the difference is worth it between the 2 and would go with the FX-8320 in your shoes, but the new Intel did just come out <scratches head>.
    Haswell did come out.. but I don't believe the price justified the performance gain from the previous generation, and they do run pretty expensive as it is.

    I believe I can squeeze a little more performance from my 7870 with an FX processor as it seems my A10 may be bottlenecking it a bit.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 1,045
    Win8/8.1,Win7-U64, Vista U64, uncounted Linux distor's
       #6

    I believe I can squeeze a little more performance from my 7870 with an FX processor as it seems my A10 may be bottlenecking it a bit.
    Crossfire that 7870, up to a 50%+ hit depending on what your doing.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #7

    APU's are solutions for people why aren't using high end products your a10 could be bottlenecking it because it is supposed to work together with a Gpu that suits it

    the FX processor will give you full use of the GPU AND CPU when you have CPU graphics it kind slows everything else up
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #8

    Take a crack at this and it will give you the best answer AMD A10-5800K vs FX-8350

    http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/388...s_FX-8320.html
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 6,879
    Win 7 Ultimate x64
       #9

    Slightly better comparison between what you have and the 8320,

    AnandTech | Bench - CPU

    If you do decide to go the FX route and Crossfire or SLI isn't a consideration, look at the 970 based boards and save a few $$. Only consideration with them is to make sure that it has heatsinks over the VRM's, quite a few MSI and Gigabyte boards don't which can and will have an affect on overclocking.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #10

    stormy13 said:
    Slightly better comparison between what you have and the 8320,

    AnandTech | Bench - CPU

    If you do decide to go the FX route and Crossfire or SLI isn't a consideration, look at the 970 based boards and save a few $$. Only consideration with them is to make sure that it has heatsinks over the VRM's, quite a few MSI and Gigabyte boards don't which can and will have an affect on overclocking.

    Stormy isn't his APU A10 the results are the same anyway though
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:52.
Find Us