New
#21
Interesting, I have just the opposite experience. I have never had a WD drive fail but have had 3 SG drives fail. I have 3 WD drives in my system right now.I realize that a lot of people would disagree with me, but I've never had very good luck with WD HDs. I'll probably stick with SG. The only reason that I might consider a WD is to go with the black edition, for the longer warranty period.I bought a 1.5 "green" Western Digital about 3 weeks ago. It's working fine. 99.99 at the time thru new egg. The particular model I got was WD15EADS-00P8B0. The 00P8B0 means it has only 3 platters, rather than the customary 4 found in earlier models. This helps it maintain pretty good speed, even though it isn't 7200 rpm.
It has 32 mb cache.
I tested its speed using HD Tune and compared it to the Western Digital 640 gig 2 platter drivei, whcih was about the fastest 7200 rpm drive on the market only 18 months ago.
The 1.5 TB drive's average transfer rate is 86% of the 640 gig drive's result.
The 1.5 TB drive's burst rate is 92% of the 640 gig drive's result.
The 640 has a slightly faster access time: 12.0 vs 13.6
The green drive uses maybe 2/3 the power of the "black" WD drives.
The WD 1.5 runs several degrees cooler in my case and is quieter than the drive it replaced.
All in all, no complaints yet. You will hear people say they aren't as fast as 7200 rpm drives, but it isn't noticeable for most uses. It is noticeably faster than 7200 rpm drives from 2005 or 2006 were.