7100 X-64 WEI seems total B/S


  1. Posts : 5,941
    Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
       #1

    7100 X-64 WEI seems total B/S


    Hi guys
    Can't understand this

    2 Computers computer A) with Intel Q9400 2.66 GHz gives WEI cpu of 7.4 )not bad for a "slightly" hobbled QUAD -. The "Hobbling" is the 6MB L2 Cache which makes it slightly cheaper than 12MB Cache which the Q9450 (I think that was the model) had. This machine has 8GB RAM installed.

    b) Computer B with 16GB RAM installed and a "Beefier" CPU (not that computer A is any slouch) INTEL I7-920 processor 2.66GHZ 8MB Cache) only gives WEI of 7.0

    Can't understand this but the "Significantly" cheaper processor (Q9400) seems according to Windows yield a better performance.

    This HAS to be B/S

    Similar DDR2 Memory etc.

    Could be Mobo differences but a CPU test is a CPU test -- should be executing CPU instructions "Natively".

    If this test is highly dependent on the MOBO then it's a total waste of time and confusing to say the least.

    Any "Techie insider" have an idea as to EXACTLY what is being tested here.

    Thanks in advanced from a very confused

    Jimbo
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 4,282
    Windows 7 Ultimate Vista Ultimate x64
       #2

    Which one do you actually feel performs better out of the two?

    Also maybe try taking out some the RAM on the i7 setup, I think I saw someone else post about how he was experiencing lower scores with more RAM for some weird reason.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 341
    XP
       #3

    Which is why I take WEI scores with a pinch of salt :)

    As a comparison, my i7 920 scores 7.6, but there are lots of factors that can effect this, motherboard quality, overclocking, memory throughput, and as Mr GRiM just stated, bloating ones system with far too much RAM

    A score of 7.0 ain't bad if your on 'stock' settings though.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 5,941
    Linux CENTOS 7 / various Windows OS'es and servers
    Thread Starter
       #4

    Mr GRiM said:
    Which one do you actually feel performs better out of the two?

    Also maybe try taking out some the RAM on the i7 setup, I think I saw someone else post about how he was experiencing lower scores with more RAM for some weird reason.

    Both seem quite fast enough for my purposes -- at this type of performance for what I usually do it's not an issue -- but I just get confused by "inaccurate" or misleading data.

    I shouldn't also have to REMOVE RAM. I run a load of Virtual machines / Virtual servers -- every SINGLE BYTE of RAM is needed for these .

    I'm not overclocking either of these CPU's - both running also on "Default BIOS" settings which does enable VT etc.

    I don't bother with the WEI in any case for "Optimising" / tweaking a machine but it's just interesting to know how MS would calculate the "CPU" index and come up with a lower "Index" for a higher power CPU.

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #5

    scaramonga said:
    Which is why I take WEI scores with a pinch of salt :)
    ..a very large pinch of salt
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:17.
Find Us