New
#21
What did i do wrong?
It may have been one of the Win 7 updates.
My Vista 64bit showed the OC speed, and I am almost positive that Win 7 may have shown the OC speed as well, but it doesn't now.
Your issue most likely stems from the fact that Windows doesn't report multipliers properly.
Here's a Prime example. The multi in my BIOS is set is @ 21*200 = 4.2Ghz.
However, Windows does not properly acknowledge the 21 multi and thinks it's @ 20*200 = 4Ghz, but I know my chip is running at 4.2ghz
Ultimately mate, it doesn't matter what Windows is reporting - your chip is running at full speed when necessary.
OK, to clearify and correct - Here's what I found out...
If you have SpeedStep or EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology) disabled in your BIOS, Windows 7/Vista WILL show BOTH the default and OVERCLOCK speeds.
As seen by my system....
EIST Disabled
EIST Enabled
CPU-Z with EIST Disabled....
CPU-Z shows the processor at full capacity, no load.
So.... depending on whether you have SpeedStep/EIST enabled or disabled will determine what Windows 7/Vista will show for clock speeds.
BTW I've enabled/disabled EIST in the BIOS. Not sure if it can be done in Windows, so.
At any rate rocstar96 HAD/HAS a valid point. And I would than say check your SpeedStep/EIST settings.
Sorry for my misunderstanding.
Peace
Last edited by sygnus21; 04 Jun 2011 at 00:36. Reason: Clarify images
Hey if anybody knows about misunderstanding or interpreting it's me. No harm no foul. At least you got to the bottom of it. Fabe
Thanks Fabe, I just hope rocstar96 sees it. We were a little harsh