New
#31
I have absolutely no problem with providing you with info that is relevant to the solution to my problem. The question you asked however was not relevant and I felt as if you were trying to expose me on this forum for using an illegitimate copy. In a way, I felt offended by you asking me that question after you already knew you did not need that info in order to help me. I felt even more offended when you refused to help because I did not disclose the irrelevant info when I could have easily make up a lie.
We can agree to disagree on what info one needs to disclose for such issue but thank you nonetheless
This guy did pretty much the same thing and this same community did not hesitate to help him
Win7 ultimate installed, downgrade to Pro?
Note that the post you refer to the original poster disclosed why he needed to downgrade and why he had Ultimate installed. You did not, which is why you were asked what the purpose was. It was assumed you had already installed and activated Ultimate because you did not disclose that you were using an evaluation version. That is where the confusion came from, and why you were asked repeatedly to give information about your copy of Ultimate.
gregrocker solution work as a treat.
Thanks alot!
The utility Andre posted does the regedit for you. Everything else remains the same as in Change versions workaround
Our threads - especially descriptively titled ones like this - remain active in Google searches permanently, which is another reason why they are not closed. When an old thread like this comes up, I try to update my links so that it continues to be of help.
I never said it should be closed. Often, newbies will unwittingly (hence the reason I asked if the poster was aware that this is an old thread) respond to ancient threads that no one is following anymore and/or are no longer relevant (often called necro posting). Some forums actively "frown" on it (fortunately, not this one). I have occasionally deliberately responded to an old post or thread because I had new, pertinent information to add that may be of benefit to people reading it in the future but I always point out that I am aware it is an old thread.
Question if I may Greg.
Are the activation methods Microsoft has now the same as they were in Nov 2011 when this thread started?