New
#21
I will make things even easier.
This is the copyright string in "easyldr" extracted using strings.exe(sysinternals):
I think that Neosmart is breaking copyright law pretending that easyldr is a Neosmart product.VS_VERSION_INFO
StringFileInfo
040904B0
CompanyName
Microsoft Corporation
FileDescription
Boot Loader
FileVersion
5.2.3790.2825 (srv03_sp2_rc.061103-1303)
InternalName
osloader.exe
LegalCopyright
Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
OriginalFilename
osloader.exe
ProductName
Microsoft
Windows
Operating System
ProductVersion
5.2.3790.2825
Brink, gregrocker I need your answer - is Neosmart violating copyright law ?
I don't think Microsoft has given a license to Neosmart to rename ntldr to easyldr and sell it as its own product.
Why would Microsoft leave its copyright notice in a product given to another company ?