32 bit vs 64 bit Comparison

GeneO · 09 Oct 2010

Lordbob75 said:

CyberZeus said:

Sorry GeneO, but you are incorrect. There is no OS memory and user memory. There is only memory. The documentation you specified has nothing to do with this: it clarifies what the memory limitations are.

Cheers

Thats right.

He is thinking about the x32 limitations.

~Lordbob

Well duh, didn;t I say that. And that document does say what I said - perhaps you don;t know how to read.

Later to you boys.

Lordbob75 · 09 Oct 2010

GeneO said:

Boy did I make a mistake coming to these forums. A bunch of know-it-alls that know next to nothing. I had hoped I would learn something here.

You can't learn anything if you only believe you are right.

I can't speak for anyone else here, but I don't tolerate much arrogance. Good riddance.

~Lordbob

Layback Bear · 09 Oct 2010

Short and sweat GeneO GOOD BY.

tw33k · 09 Oct 2010

I think you all need to read this and apologise to GeneO

Memory Management - x86 Virtual Address Space - Ask the Performance Team - Site Home - TechNet Blogs

Lordbob75 · 09 Oct 2010

tw33k said:

I think you all need to read this and apologise to GeneO

Memory Management - x86 Virtual Address Space - Ask the Performance Team - Site Home - TechNet Blogs

So why didn't he post that (or something similar) when I asked for documentation?
Instead he posts x32 memory limitations, which had nothing to do with it...

Thus my confusion.

Tw33k, thanks for the link. I guess he was right. I still don't appreciate his arrogance or insults because of it.

I had no idea this existed, and had never heard of it. That is why I asked for an article/documentation on it. If he (or someone else) posted that, then great, I learned something.
Being arrogant accomplishes nothing, except relieving himself of respect.

~Lordbob

tw33k · 09 Oct 2010

I can understand his frustration. Maybe he didn't handle it the best but I get that. Especially CyberZeus saying "Sorry GeneO, but you are incorrect. There is no OS memory and user memory." To me that is both ignorant and arrogant.

Lordbob75 · 09 Oct 2010

tw33k said:

I can understand his frustration. Maybe he didn't handle it the best but I get that. Especially CyberZeus saying "Sorry GeneO, but you are incorrect. There is no OS memory and user memory." To me that is both ignorant and arrogant.

Ignorant yes. I didn't know it existed either.
Neither of us were intentionally arrogant/insulting though (at least I wasnt).

~Lordbob

tw33k · 09 Oct 2010

No..you weren't

Layback Bear · 09 Oct 2010

Folks I think we all are willing to work with anybody and yes there is always some thing we can all learn but smart mouth don't get it. If some one wants to try the golden little goody found on the internet and let us all know how it works, please do. We will be waiting.

CyberZeus · 10 Oct 2010

tw33k said:

I can understand his frustration. Maybe he didn't handle it the best but I get that. Especially CyberZeus saying "Sorry GeneO, but you are incorrect. There is no OS memory and user memory." To me that is both ignorant and arrogant.

I'm NOT ignorant and arrogant and I didn't want to be. And I never said GeneO is.

However, thank you, tw33k: very nice from you.