Windows 7 Forums
Welcome to Windows 7 Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find support and solutions for any problems regarding your Windows 7 PC be it Dell, HP, Acer, Asus or a custom build. We also provide an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Windows 7: Snow Leopard gets richer, thinner, cheaper than Windows

19 Jun 2009   #1

Windows 7 32bit RTM
Snow Leopard gets richer, thinner, cheaper than Windows

Prince McLean, AppleInsider

After trying to beat back the Mac’s increasing encroachment into the PC world with ads focused on price, Microsoft’s club has been picked up by Apple to give Windows 7 an embarrassing pummeling in terms of price.

Snow Leopard gets richer, thinner, cheaper than Windows 7
Explaining that the company wanted as many Mac OS X Leopard users as possible to upgrade to the new Snow Leopard, Apple’s senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing Phil Schiller announced a $29 upgrade price for Snow Leopard and a $49 family pack upgrade. Users who buy a new Mac between the June 8 announcement and the release of Snow Leopard can get a copy of the new software for even cheaper, just $9.95 to cover shipping and handling.

Apple hasn’t explicitly stated it yet, but it appears that the retail box of Snow Leopard could still be priced at $129, although it’s hard to imagine who would need to buy the new operating system at retail rather than as an upgrade, particularly since it requires a relatively modern Mac to run, mostly machines that either shipped with Leopard or have already upgraded to use it.

While Apple is slashing the cost of Snow Leopard dramatically even as demand and interest in the Mac platform is on an upswing, Microsoft did just the opposite with the release of Windows Vista, bumping up the cost of upgrades and retail copies and introducing new pricing tiers to artificially restrict features to pricier editions even as expansion of the PC market began to plateau and as the emergence of cheap new netbooks began to question the need for an expensive operating system.

Microsoft has since backtracked on Vista’s pricing, and for the first time ever, the company has essentially given away a year’s worth of Windows licensing by pumping out free copies of its Windows 7 “release candidate” software on the market to stem the tide of Windows defectors and entice disgruntled Vista users back with a real life, wide scale Mojave Experiment. Of course, it’s only free until next summer, at which point users’ Windows 7 PCs will stop working until payments are made. In any other industry, this strategy might be characterized as product dumping and bait and switch fraud, but in the PC industry that Microsoft has ruled as a de-facto corporate government for the last twenty years, its just business as usual.

Leopard vs Vista

Apple’s decision to offer Snow Leopard to Mac users on the cheap contrasts with Microsoft’s first-one-is-free tactic for Windows in that Apple is essentially rewarding its loyal customers, while Microsoft is working to win back the interest of jilted PC users after several bouts of abuse: security nightmares, price tag beatings, broken promises on features, and increasingly poor performance.

Unlike the very popular Leopard, many Windows PC users who ended up with Vista demanded to get a Windows XP downgrade. PC makers felt such a backlash in customer demand that they pressured Microsoft to at least bundle a Windows XP installer disc with new systems, allowing them to continue to sell PCs while Microsoft could continue to at least count the sales’ bundled Vista licenses to claim some success for the company’s most underwhelming Windows release in recent memory.

Vista was soundly rejected even by corporate users, who have historically acted as a strong barrier to any new competition against Windows in the PC operating system market by resisting alternative software in lockstep. Microsoft’s monopoly essentially attacked itself as if an autoimmune disorder; the company has worked so hard to prevent new competitors from entering the market that it now can’t offer anything really new itself either.

Bertrand Serlet, Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering, was quick to grab at that loose string on Microsoft’s sweater and tugged hard to unravel it at WWDC, noting that while Vista attempted to compare itself with Mac OS X, it carried forward the same old technologies that had contaminated the Windows experience since the 90s, specifically noting problem-plagued DLLs, the configuration mess of the Windows Registry, the archaic notion of expecting users to defragment their disks manually, and the annoyance of Vista’s UAC popups.

“What a big hole Microsoft has dug,” Serlet said. “They’re trying to get out of it with Windows 7; it’s the same old technology as Vista. Fundamentally, it’s just another version of Vista.”

From the beginning, Apple has characterized Snow Leopard as a refinement release, initially suggesting it would have no new features apart from support for Microsoft Exchange. While there are a lot of refinements and some new features, the company has stuck to making Snow Leopard primarily a unifying reference release rather than a splashy collection of new consumer features as Leopard was. “We love Leopard, so we decided to build upon Leopard,” Serlet said. “We want to build a better Leopard.”

Snow Leopard vs Seven

Some pundits were confused by Serlet’s comments, thinking that there was some hypocrisy in his nailing Windows 7 for being another Vista when Snow Leopard is itself clearly another Leopard. But the point Serlet made wasn’t that Microsoft was failing to make great enough leaps in its marketing. It’s that Microsoft was really only focusing on making great leaps with its marketing. While Snow Leopard jettisons a variety of legacy technologies and ushers in significant new ones, including Grand Central Dispatch, OpenCL, and QuickTime X, it still increments itself following the usual sequence of new Mac OS X reference releases to 10.6.

The name Windows 7 suggests a major new release, when in reality the company’s new operating system is internally numbered as Windows 6.1. Microsoft’s executives have never denied that Windows 7 was actually a tuneup of Vista. In the words of Microsoft’s CEO Steve Ballmer, “it’s Windows Vista, a lot better.”

Microsoft is notorious for picking its software version numbers out of marketing meetings rather than scheduling releases around engineering efforts as Apple has. Mac OS X has been progressively and predictably notching up a single increment with every reference release over the past decade, and the internal numbering system for its Darwin core OS numbers back to NeXTSTEP releases of the late 80s (Snow Leopard’s Darwin OS release will be 10.0). Mac OS X itself gets its “ten” from the releases of the classic Mac OS. No number games there.

In contrast, the Windows NT code base that both Vista and Windows 7 are based on started its numbering with version 3.1. Exchange Server similarly started out without a 1.0 or 2.0 release for marketing reasons. And really, who would have gotten excited about Windows 2000 and Windows XP if they’d been pushed to market as simply Windows 5.0 and 5.1? Vista and “Windows 7” similarly have far more flamboyant panache than Windows 6.0 and 6.1.

Too Rich

There’s no rules that define how developers must number their software, and Microsoft can use all the distraction it wants in creating number games that seek to distance Windows 7 from the disaster that was Vista. Apple certainly employs as much hyperbolic marketing as it can to sell its engineering work to consumers. However, what consumers will see when they unbox a new Windows PC will be a tamed down version of Vista with fewer problems, with a more Mac-like user interface. In contrast, what Mac users will experience with Snow Leopard is a noticeably faster, animately richer, 6GB thinner, and much cheaper operating system experience.

Steve Jobs didn’t even need to show up at WWDC to disprove the notion that you can never be too rich or too thin. Now his company is set to show that it’s not afraid to be cheap, either. And while Microsoft can continue to harp on the idea that there are lower-end PCs from Dell and HP that forgo sexiness and performance and usability to deliver cheap hardware, it won’t be able to say the same thing about the product it actually sells, because Windows 7 has to be priced at around $300 retail to prop up Microsoft’s software-only Windows business, something that’s already in flames with the collapse of global PC growth and the tumorous expansion of cheap netbooks that don’t reap Microsoft any software revenues.

With Snow Leopard costing a fraction of the cost of Windows 7, it will make Microsoft’s cheapskate ads ring hollow and force the company to face dramatically competitive software pricing pressures that the PC industry has never demanded of Microsoft before. In twenty years, the price of Windows has only ratcheted upwards as PC prices have dropped. Apple is now cutting off the PC operating system’s oxygen supply just as it helped dry up any demand for Windows Mobile licensing with the iPhone.

Even if Windows 7 gains traction in ways Vista never did, the downward pricing pressure Apple is exerting will prevent Microsoft from inhaling the inflated revenues the company has grown addicted to, which will benefit both Mac users and PC users. Additionally, it promises to potentially open up more opportunities for alternative operating systems such as Linux by cutting the dominating control Microsoft ********s over PC hardware vendors.
source: Snow Leopard gets richer, thinner, cheaper than Windows 7 — RoughlyDrafted Magazine
My System SpecsSystem Spec
19 Jun 2009   #2

Windows 7 RTM Ultimate - Activated (Technet)

Gee that doesn't read like it is biased at all does it....

I think they forgot to mention that there is little if any choice in the equipement to run Snow Leapard......Only one manufacturer....Apple....and not cheap either...
My System SpecsSystem Spec
19 Jun 2009   #3

Windows 7

Eh, very very few people ever upgrade the OS that came on their computer. MS was hoping for maybe 5% of users to upgrade to Vista. The retail and upgrade pricing is moot for most people. The only market this really matters is for sub-$200 netbooks, where a $50 licence cost is pretty hefty.
My System SpecsSystem Spec

19 Jun 2009   #4

Windows 7 x64 (RTM via MSDN)

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by jw12345 View Post
Eh, very very few people ever upgrade the OS that came on their computer. MS was hoping for maybe 5% of users to upgrade to Vista. The retail and upgrade pricing is moot for most people. The only market this really matters is for sub-$200 netbooks, where a $50 licence cost is pretty hefty.

While us geeks get excited about a new OS, the vast majority only cares, because the new OS is what will be on their new PC. MS makes it's money in the Enterprise and OEM worlds. Even the folks that "upgraded" to XP when they purchased their new PC's helped Vista's bottom line.

And even netbooks will either maintain XP or the new ones will get Win 7, and the majority users will just continue on with what is default. Doubtful that many will actually buy an upgrade to Win 7.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
19 Jun 2009   #5

Microsoft Community Contributor Award Recipient

Vista x64 / 7 X64

He's obviously a Mac supporter - doesn't mean he's talking rubbish, though.

MS has a falling revenue scenario as they depend on the o/s income.

Reduced churn in pc's and the emergence of the netbook market are putting the squeeze on.

The hurried "re release " of XP for note/net/whatever only brings in an alleged $15 per license.

Contrast that with an alleged $60 per oem Vista license.

Dell reports MS are increasing the license fees for 7 - putting downward pressure on component quality.

The saviour might be busineses moving to the new o/s - not because they want to - but because what they already have is pretty old now and MS is withdrawing support.

They won't be rushing.

I recall one CEO saying how is moving to Vista going to increase my sales of widgets ? - it isn't . The same still applies.
My System SpecsSystem Spec

Thread Tools

Similar help and support threads
Thread Forum
Installation of Snow Leopard and Triple Boot(Windows + Windows + Snow)
I hope this question has a place in windows 7 forums; if not, forgive me. I have a ASUS G72 with Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 2.53 GHz. I have one HDD and 4 partitions in it(c is windows 7 home premium x64, d is windows 7 ultimate x64, e is empty and i am planning to install snow leopard on e and f...
Installation & Setup
SP1 is Windows 7’s “Snow Leopard”
Source -
Windows 7 x64 Can't See Mac OS X Snow Leopard
My Win7 x64 machine can see other machines on the LAN (some running Win7 and some XP), but can't see my Mac Snow Leopard machine. However, the Mac can see the Win7 machine. (Also, the Win7 box can see a Win7 virtual machine running in VMware Fusion on the Mac.) Note that I've tried following...
Network & Sharing
Snow Leopard v. Windows 7 After reading that... Windows 7 is still better!
Snow Leopard is copying Windows 7.
Anyone notice.... WWDC 2009 Bertrand Serlet talks Snow Leopard. -90% Refinements. -Technologies. -Exchange. Copying... -Leopard to Snow Leopard. -WIndows Vista to Windows 7.
General Discussion

Our Sites

Site Links

About Us

Find Us

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:01.
Twitter Facebook