New
#20
that's not true. there is a little rush-in-current whne you start a fluorescent ballast. that maybe is 3-5 times of regular current. Assuming it takes 1 second to turn the bulb on, it would take 5 seconds of regular lighting time.
When I was in 3rd grade (many years ago) teachers would tell us the same tale about the 2-3 hours of energy it takes. Fact is, if you did the math how much current that had to be, you'd kill the power plant by turning on a bulb (sure you'd kill your fuses).
abut the mercury: it is less than the coal power plant would expose us to when using more energy. I agree, compact fluorescent (CFL) are not the greatest compared to high-lumen T8 or T5 4'lamps. both are twice as efficient than CFL, with programmed start ballast can be turned on and off frequently (in combination with occupancy sensor), have only a third or quarter of mercury per lumen hour. For little lamps I'd just go with the LEDs
(I do commercial lighting design, for residential use CFL probably right now are the best choice due to the low number of hours used, although LED seem to be making progress). CFL have the inheritant flaw of overheating the ballast, the less efficient shape etc. I'd never use them on commercial jobs. however, they beat incandescent and halogen. Jsut stick with GE or soem other brand. If you buy some Chinese import crap with some unknown name, of course they won't last. Same with the tons of cheap LED lamps. there are a few really good ones, many are jsut crap. but tha tis not inherent to the LED itself, inherent to cheap crap.
About the PC shutdown: I unplug my PC (and router and modem) with a power strip. Zero consumption while off. I also think rebooting every once awhile cleans everything. It only takes soem seconds to boot. The most time my PC hangs around in BIOS and RAID controller startup etc. Windows itself is really fast. So now if they got rid of the pre-windows stuff, that'd be great.