Microsoft Removes Gold Certified Partner Over Telephons Scam Claims

I tend to agree with the sentiment, but I don't think that this would constitute a death sentence. When it comes to corporations, it would seem that it might be more effective to permanently remove their right to do business. Not only the corporation, but the actual persons that owning and running it.

That is the reason that I didn't limit the action against only the corportation, but also the real people. I admit that it is likely that they would find an alternative means of doing business, but this type of legal action would give them serious reason to pause and consider before doing something such as this.

richnrockville said:

seekermeister said:

I tend to agree with the sentiment, but I don't think that this would constitute a death sentence. When it comes to corporations, it would seem that it might be more effective to permanently remove their right to do business. Not only the corporation, but the actual persons that owning and running it.

FWIW: The only thing wrong with removing their right to do business is that they just close up shop and open it under a different name. That's what the medicare fraud people do all the time. Limite Liability Corporations or LLC's is what is they file under and just change the name and away they go for another round.

Rich

I wasn't familiar with the term LLC, so I Googled, and found that it stands for a limited liability company, not corporation.

Limited liability company - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Either way, it seems to give the owners too much latitude.

essenbe said:

I say good for Microsoft. I also say prosecution should follow.

agree'd