New
#20
hitlers a noob he only cares about benchmarks lol just oc :P
hitlers a noob he only cares about benchmarks lol just oc :P
This thread reminds me of those “pundits” who are declaring that the desktop is dead.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/the-desktop-is-dead-long-live-the-desktop/13417
If the desktop is on its deathbed than Nvidia’s development of IT and the whirlwind of interest that it is causing is in vain, to say the least. But is it in vain? I say nein, nein, nein!!
I quote from the above-mentioned article from ZDNET:
The future holds a great deal of promise for mobile technology. We are already seeing laptops with powerful, quad-core CPUs, with a lot of RAM and high end graphics chipsets. Currently these tend to be a desktop system crammed into a laptop chassis, but the components are still getting smaller and more powerful with each passing year.
However, these devices still have a finite lifespan because they are not modular — once a laptop is obsolete, you usually can’t upgrade the CPU and graphics. Most laptop owners buy a newer, more powerful laptop every 2-3 years. It’s wasteful, and the desktop PC still has the advantage in this area.
Whatever Nvidia’s IT is, I am almost certain that it is intended for the desktop.
$1000 after taxes no wonder Hitler was pissed hahaha
Benchmarks are my life Nvidia is worst then Heroin lmao
Too much I'd settle for 680. This is a war between nVidia and AMD. Either could care less about the consumer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqfMy...eature=related