New
#90
I'm not an XP - Xpert but no it didn't have readyboost as it is in Vista and Windows 7 has changed it further.
I'm not an XP - Xpert but no it didn't have readyboost as it is in Vista and Windows 7 has changed it further.
Correct me if I'm wrong but.. isn't this idea a little pointless? Ram sticks are cheaper and vastly more effective. Why bother with a slow USB when you can have actual RAM..?![]()
i dont use it personally but i think its a quality solution for older systems to run there os more effectivily.
Can someone enlighten me as to what the difference between readyboost and the pagefile is?
I've learned to love ready boost. probably because of my ancient pc... the manufacture date is 2004-ish (thats ancient for tech).
hey guys i was just wondering something and maybe it has been answered but if you could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated.
my vostro 1000 is only capable of 2gigs of max RAM () i have recently purchased a 8 gig sandisk cruzer and made it boostable.
here is a screen before the boost:
and after:
i swear that some apps run much quicker.
for example live mail receives messages wicked quick. it used to tie up my system but now it runs quietly in the background.
my question is if my computer can only take 2 gigs of max RAM, is readyboost making a difference or is it just a placebo effect?
thanks
easy mistake to make...
darn it im the middle (my lappy can take 4gb not 8gb...)
yeah only if you are ram limited (or using DDR ram...) then readyboost is useful for you...:)
for a video on this explaining it...http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-vista/features/performance.aspx said:
The Advancement of Windows: Michael Fortin - Windows Vista SuperFetch | Going Deep | Channel 9
no it is possible that under certain conditions you can actually see a performance gains by using readyboost..![]()