New
#50
I don't see a reason up upgrade (or go for a later o/s) unless there's a feature or specific reason to do do so.
NT built in VB > XP > built in DotNet (notyet:))
Vista > all processors started by default (or nearly all)
Win7 > streamlined (worked out how to started the processors as needed)
Win8 > really cut back (more interested in pay per use)
Win8.1 > don't care win8.2 > still don't care.
Look at the kernel versions between all these...
Besides the pretty(or not so) graphics.
Over the years there have been many predictions of which operating systems will succeed and which ones will fail. I care little for these predictions because I have lived long enough to see many expert predictions that have been very wrong. Pick any of the most successful operating systems and there were experts who predicted it would be a flop. Only time will tell. Until then it is all just guesses.
I have been around operating systems since their birth in the early 60's. In fact I wrote part of one of the very first OS in 64 - IBM /360 BPS.
When I use this Kinder-UI of 8.1 on my desktop it feels like walking around in one of my wife's skirts in Scotland. It does the job but it sure feels funny.
If I want a tablet UI, I use my Nexus. At least Android can do the job in 256MB of RAM and the UI feels natural for that device. Try to use that on your desktop - it's a mess. I run Andoid x86 in VMware Player. It is no fun.