New
#1
Again MSE has the worst scores yet many Geeks still prefer it.
Windows 7 anti-malware products compared
-
-
New #2
There is not much technical information in that article. Actually, a rather short summary. It would be interesting to see more of the test results.
A little more here:
http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home...7/janfeb-2014/
Are these folks selling certifications for AV manufacturers to display on their products?
-
New #3
-
-
New #5
What is the use of incomparable integration and stable co-existence if it lets viruses through?
-
-
New #7
Lol you guys must understand that the creators of viruses knows how to remove the virus. So what I mean is the stronger the AV the stronger the virus could get in.
-
-
New #9
You have to remember its not always about you. Your experiences don't necessarily reflect those of others who do use MSE, or any other AV product.
The BSOD reference is exactly what KingArthur is referring to. Broaden your horizons a bit and have a look at the objective analysis in the BSOD section some time.
Windows 7 anti-malware products compared
Posted: 24 Mar 2014
Read more at: Windows 7 anti-malware products compared | ZDNetAV-TEST Institute, an independent test lab specializing in anti-malware, has released the results of their latest tests of anti-malware products. These tests were run on 64-bit Windows 7 in January and February of this year.
The tests compared nine business products and 25 consumer products. The products were compared for detection of malware, including 0-day malware for which the products had no signature; performance impact on the system; and false positive detections and warnings.
Quote
Related Discussions