New
#30
This looks like scary news. Does Microsoft need to reinvent itself?
Microsoft to lay off 18,000 workers - National | Globalnews.ca
This looks like scary news. Does Microsoft need to reinvent itself?
Microsoft to lay off 18,000 workers - National | Globalnews.ca
That's quite a large number, weren't early "guestimates" more around 5000~6000 or thereabouts? Sad day for the folks that will be getting axed. :\
Nobody reads the news anymore? Broadwell tablet CPU's will already be fanless. When Skylake tablet CPUs get released, they will be almost as good as today's Haswell desktop CPUs + also fanless. I shudder to think how much more powerful tablet hardware will become a decade from now.
Microsoft is trying to position itself now for when tablets will completely replace desktops/laptops...
Inferior cooling? Theyre already going to release CPUs that won't need a fan on top of it to keep it cool soon... Just wait a few more years, integrated graphics will become so much more powerful and run much cooler that you won't realize notice a benefit in discreet graphics. That'll be the day gamers run Unreal Engine VI on their large screen monitor powered by a tiny tablet!
If my tablet has to relay on other equipment like a docking station with a mouse and larger screen, than that means my tablet cannot do the job I need it to do, without more equipment if what you are saying is accurate. So I would still have to buy all the other "desktop" components to make my tablet perform up to the performance of a desktop. If I'm at the house and need to do some CAD work and I couldn't do it unless I went somewhere that had a docking station, that means the tablet is just a tablet until you attached it to other equipment to transform it into a essentially a desktop, so again the tablet can do it's job up to a point, but needs to relay on more equipment to make it "powerful" enough to do a desktops or even a laptops job.
I think JIMBO hit it on the head about the 100% desktop users may not realize how much mobile computing there is, but on the flip side, people who have never really needed to use a desktop for actual desktop jobs (extreme gaming/CAD/video editing) love tablets (which I do for quick use as well) so the tablet can replicate everything they used their big clunky PC used to do. If you just browse the internet, play an occasional game an do work that only requires 2GB of RAM at most, you've never really had to use a desktop in the way people here describe, so they don't understand the argument of "getting away from the PC"
If a tablet can do everything my desktop does it would be something that I would be interested in. The thing I'm not interested in is small keyboards, mice and screens. If I could hook up my keyboard, mouse and 24" monitor when at home then what's the difference? I'd have a single device that can replace my laptop, desktop, GPS, phone and who knows what else. What really gives me pause is the cost and reliability. You aren't going to able to repair these tiny machines as easily as a desktop and the cost is pretty outrageous for what you get.
Adding the things to make it a desktop does not concern me. I had to add them to my tower to make it work as a desktop otherwise it would have been a door stop with lights.
At my age I'm thinking that there is one more desktop in my future. This computer would go to my wife to replace the 13 year old XP machine. I doubt seriously it will be a mini does it all tablet as they have just not come to a point that a desktop can be replaced by one, maybe there is one that can but I certainly can't afford it.
Fanless CPUs have been around for a long time, largely with CPUs like Intel Atom and ARM geared towards power and temperature efficient mobile applications. However, these mobile CPUs have always sacrificed performance and power to achieve the power (as in electrical) and temperature requirements that need to be met.
Until we move to a fundamentally different idea of crunching numbers, CPUs (and GPUs) will produce more heat as they try to go faster. Intel hit this wall with their Pentium 4s back in the day and they finally got around it by introducing multi-core CPUs rather than trying to make a single core extremely powerful.
With regards to integrated graphics, one of the biggest bottlenecks holding them back is slow RAM. Part of why discrete video cards are so much faster than integrated solutions is because they have their own store of RAM (GDDR RAM); integrated graphics need to borrow system RAM (DDR RAM) which is considerably slower than the GDDR RAM used in video cards which in turn slows down the entire graphics subsystem of a computer.
Professional graphics work such as 3D rendering will also absolutely require professional-grade video cards like the Nvidia Quadro series that cost upwards of several grand a card, their kind of specialized workloads are simply too much for integrated graphics solutions (let alone consumer-grade discrete video cards) to handle.
Last edited by King Arthur; 17 Jul 2014 at 21:00.