Windows 7's Unexpected 'Killer' Feature

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #10

    pezzonovante said:
    Randall C Kennedy is a complete joke.

    That's why we normally don't post his stuff on this site...
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 8,375
    W7 Ultimate x64/W10 Pro x64/W11 Pro Triple Boot - Main PC W7 Remote PC Micro ATX W7 Pro x64/W11 Pro
    Thread Starter
       #11

    I wasn't favoring or discrediting any one author but came across this one at PC World when looking what news was seen for 7.
      My Computers


  3. Posts : 1,112
    XP_Pro, W7_7201, W7RC.vhd, SciLinux5.3, Fedora12, Fedora9_2x, OpenSolaris_09-06
       #12

    kegobeer said:
    I really enjoyed this:

    Given the same number of CPU cores, Windows 7 runs circles around both Windows Vista and Windows XP. In fact, the results aren't even close: In one multiprocess workflow test, Windows 7 outpaced Windows XP by 250 percent -- this on an eight-core (dual quad-core Xeon) HP Z800 workstation.
    This is Windows 7's killer feature. It means that, as customers invest in new PC hardware, they'll be better positioned to reap the improvements in CPU, memory, and chip set performance by deploying Windows 7. It also means that sticking with Windows XP -- ostensibly because it is less bloated and performs better -- is a fool's errand.
    Times have changed. The hardware landscape is much different than when Windows XP was on the drawing boards. Back then, the concept of a multicore CPU was still just that: a concept. Windows XP was designed for a world of single CPU desktops and the occasional two- or four-way (discrete CPUs, not cores) engineering workstation. It simply isn't smart enough to know how to leverage something as complex as a modern-day Core i7- or E5xxx-series Xeon processor.
    .
    I wonder how the XP die hards will react?
    .

    .



      My Computer


  4. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #13

    Night Hawk said:
    I wasn't favoring or discrediting any one author but came across this one at PC World when looking what news was seen for 7.
    That's okay mate. I just remember that John didn't really want any link backs between him and this site.

    Personally, I find R.C.K a riot :)
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 8,375
    W7 Ultimate x64/W10 Pro x64/W11 Pro Triple Boot - Main PC W7 Remote PC Micro ATX W7 Pro x64/W11 Pro
    Thread Starter
       #14

    I guess I got stuck with the bad one this time!

    The problem with a place like a large magazine's online site is the large volume of "contributers" where a few end up being....? less favorable?
      My Computers


  6. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #15

    I wouldn't worry about it mate :)
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 1,360
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #16

    I'm only using about 32gb of data and that's with everything installed on my C: (Office Ultimate, Expression Suite 3)

    Edit: Dang, I'm late.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 8,375
    W7 Ultimate x64/W10 Pro x64/W11 Pro Triple Boot - Main PC W7 Remote PC Micro ATX W7 Pro x64/W11 Pro
    Thread Starter
       #17

    Zen00 said:
    I'm only using about 32gb of data and that's with everything installed on my C: (Office Ultimate, Expression Suite 3)

    Edit: Dang, I'm late.
    So that's where my folder went!

    That's about the size of just one folder around here! Try 134gb taken up after the clean install of 7 a week ago.
      My Computers


  9. Posts : 33
    Windows 7 Premium Retail
       #18

    kegobeer said:
    I really enjoyed this:

    Given the same number of CPU cores, Windows 7 runs circles around both Windows Vista and Windows XP. In fact, the results aren't even close: In one multiprocess workflow test, Windows 7 outpaced Windows XP by 250 percent -- this on an eight-core (dual quad-core Xeon) HP Z800 workstation.
    This is Windows 7's killer feature. It means that, as customers invest in new PC hardware, they'll be better positioned to reap the improvements in CPU, memory, and chip set performance by deploying Windows 7. It also means that sticking with Windows XP -- ostensibly because it is less bloated and performs better -- is a fool's errand.
    Times have changed. The hardware landscape is much different than when Windows XP was on the drawing boards. Back then, the concept of a multicore CPU was still just that: a concept. Windows XP was designed for a world of single CPU desktops and the occasional two- or four-way (discrete CPUs, not cores) engineering workstation. It simply isn't smart enough to know how to leverage something as complex as a modern-day Core i7- or E5xxx-series Xeon processor.
    I wonder how the XP die hards will react?
    They will be glad they waited for 7 ... and didn't fall into the Vista trap.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 5,807
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64 - Mac OS X 10.6.4 x64
       #19

    Night Hawk said:
    Zen00 said:
    I'm only using about 32gb of data and that's with everything installed on my C: (Office Ultimate, Expression Suite 3)

    Edit: Dang, I'm late.
    So that's where my folder went!

    That's about the size of just one folder around here! Try 134gb taken up after the clean install of 7 a week ago.
    I normally use about 13GB of disc space on my laptop (Windows + Office + ETC)

    I can see you guys shuddering as you read this
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29.
Find Us