New
#100
I am trying to get used to LibreOffice. So far it's been decent, not without it's learning curve. Base does not seem to play well with older mdb files.
I am trying to get used to LibreOffice. So far it's been decent, not without it's learning curve. Base does not seem to play well with older mdb files.
Yeah, there definitely is a learning curve, especially if one has to relearn how to do things after being used to a different program. Also, LibreOffice depends far more heavily on Styles than MS Office ever did, especially in Writer, something I have yet to fully wrap my mind around. Still, I find Writer easier to use than Word most of the time once I got used to it. I don't miss MS Office one bit.
I've used Calc on occasion but I didn't have to do much relearning since I didn't use Excel much.
I haven't had any need to use Draw yet and I've never used Impress, Math Formula (me?, do math?) or Base programs I never needed.
I ran into the same learning curve when i ditched Adobe Acrobat Standard for Qoppa's PDF Studio Pro but, once I got used to it, I like it considerably better than Acrobat and can do everything I used to use Acrobat for only easier, especially when using multiple screens.
I also switched to LibreOffice last year. Have no issues with it at all. I'm not really an advanced Office user and only use Office for basic needs really, mostly word documents. But, it works perfectly well for me. I can do all the things I did on Office 2007 in LibreOffice. I'm not interested in having multiple different subscriptions for everything these days.
LibreOffice plus Google Drive works well enough for me.
How do advanced Office users find working with LibreOffice? I'm genuinely interested to see how it stacks up compared to the latest MS offerings.
I've used LibreOffice and other office clones in business, most of the time they are fine for most documents. The issue is that everything is fine until you try to work with a group or individual that is using word, (or another Clone version).
The major issue concerns sharing documents where the output will have minor spacing and layout differences in the clone compared with Office - maybe this is acceptable for general internal documents but the same is not true with documents that are destined for customers, suppliers, government agencies, etc, a lot of which could need to be automatically "read" so the data boxes on a form for instance have to always be in an identical position from at least two edges.
It a system where the document could move from department to department, or company to company, there is no leeway for variation, the discrepancy is often magnified due to a document going through may hands
Thanks Barman, interesting to read. So for the average home user I'm guessing it's fine, but documents don't always transfer 100% like for like between clients, so lacking a little in a business environment.
Also, would the lack of an email client in LibreOffice be a big deal breaker when it comes to business use? I personally switched to Thunderbird a few years ago, after they retired Windows Live Mail. Even though I did have Outlook 2007 installed on my PCs, I didn't use it. I'm guessing clients like TB wouldn't be an option in a business environment? I'm self-employed, but the work I do now isn't Office based, in fact I haven't worked in an Office for about 20 years. So I'm a little out of the loop when it comes to that.
Again, I'm just a basic email user and all my accounts are just standard Hotmail or Gmail accounts.
A lot of enterprise users are totally reliant on Exchange for internal and external company communication, groupshare for work tasks, and scheduling, as there are few if any alternatives for Outlook when dealing with exchange then for companies who use it it is an essential. Also of course The interaction potential between exchange and the office suite make Outlook an essential link to tie things together. Outlook has always been available separate from office in some markets where Open source Office suites are used in government and education in developing area for cost reasons, but the integration is nowhere as developed as can be seen with Office, Outlook, and exchange
One word: PDF.
Seriously, exporting ODT files to PDF makes them formatting stable and readable for everyone, no matter what platform they are using. I have my LibreOffice installations set to embeded the original document inside the PDF when I export it so, to simplify editing the PDF later, all I need to do is open the PDF in the appropriate LibreOffice app, usually (almost always, actually), for me, Writer. I almost ways export to PDF, then discard the original ODT file since I can always retrieve it from the PDF if ncessary. It's easier than keeping ODT and PDF versions of the same document.
Its the save / export differences, between office and the clones to the output format, that's the issue and this would still be present even if you use a PDF format for storage -
The embedded "original" ODF would be different from the ODF that has been edited in Word
The only way that may work is create a .PDF from the original document either from a DOCx or ODF with specific options such as to ensure that the PDF was identical wherever it was from, and then you from then on only directly edit the .PDF with PDF edit software.
The fact is that when dealing with a document containing positionally specific objects which may be edited by multiple users, you must choose either Word or one of the clones to exclusively work with the document, as they are not sufficiently compatible. also of course the divergence goes both ways so with a document that goes back and forth between multiple team members the minor changes would soon multiply to a level where it is very obvious.
In a company where there is no interaction with outside agencies where you have no control is involved you can switch all of your employees to any office system as long as this system is used exclusively.
A few of the issue may of course be intentional - Microsoft has already replaced it's proprietary .DOC format to DOCx due to the format being reverse engineered and used in early clones - it may be a useful test to dig out a 20 year .Doc and print it in a 20 year old word and then in Office 2019, (365) and see if they have visible differences.
These minor changes are important to companies who want an specific company image...
Many years ago I developed a system for constructing quotations from set phases and boilerplate text - the engineer would tick boxes on a screen or paper sheet and the WP operator would duplicate these selections in the Word Processor, because all the WP operators had their own idea of the company standard for presentation all the auto text, and images was inserted into pre formatted blank documents, so that they all gave an acceptable output style - this was built on WordPerfect and then needed completely updating as time past and versions changed, I did actually update it to Word when windows and Office took off
I've made up my mind what I'm going to do come January 2020. I'm going to stick with Seven and not upgrade to Ten. To this end, I've spent a few days moving across music, documents and photos onto my second laptop which is for storage only and not connected to the net and taking same off the Samsung, my net laptop. I've also backed up everything on two external hard drives.
I may get the premium version of MWBytes at some point.
ON the windows update advising end of product, it states Internet Explorer will no longer be supported but I use Chrome mostly so would that be safe or would it be vulnerable as it's being run on an unsupported OS?
LB