New
#1
makes sense to me that the rc escrow is 7077+ while the rc is 7100....
which i have said a few hours ago..
So I’ve actually been meaning to write this for a while because it’s been annoying the hell out of me. I have seen people saying that 7105 and 7106 of Windows 7 are RC builds and the RC will be > 7100. Well all I can say to those people is that you’re wrong, you fail, and you need to learn how the development process works inside Redmond before you go spouting about a build being an RC ESCROW.....
More|Source: Windows 7 RC/RTM Builds – Clearing the Confusion at Chris’ Repository of Knowledge
makes sense to me that the rc escrow is 7077+ while the rc is 7100....
which i have said a few hours ago..
Its been said for ages this is how it is, i just wanted to post a solid article explaining it so everbody knows how it works.
wow.. finally i understood how development process works.. thanks a lot man...
if this gospel is true, this has to be the strangest format of compiling/splitting that MS has ever done or been seen doing. This strange calculation format wasnt used in whistler or longhorn for that matter.... so why the strange wacky stuff now? I wonder if these ppl are the ones who call in UFO's.... just doesnt seem right to me, very odd
I don't really understand what the point of debugging an "RC build" and at the same time introducing new code (untested?) for "RTM branch"
It sound a little mad for me, as RC should be the starting point of the final debugging process before RTM...
Well seems that this option is the one most going around atm.
Still i dont see anyone that can make me believe this for sure 100%.
LOL!
All that wasted time for those who were trying to convert the leaked Chinese build 7106 to English, when in fact it was an older build.
ye this is all new (/sarcasm) and we where not saying this for week(s), however now that someone puts it on blog its true all of the sudden :)