Windows 7: Vista minus the nagging

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Windows 7: Vista minus the nagging

    Posted: 28 Nov 2008
    In recent weeks I’ve had the chance to chat with many Windows admins about the tech media’s unfair treatment of Windows Vista and Windows 7. These are well-known Windows experts such as Jeremy Moskowitz, creator of PolicyPak, and well-respected journalists such as Greg Shields, who is taking aim at InfoWorld’s “patently biased” Windows 7 compatibility calculator this week in his Realtime Community blog.
    Now Derek Melber, a true legend in the field of Windows know-how and technical training, is fuming over ignorant comments regarding the UAC (User Account Control) technology in Vista and Windows 7.
    Read this full article ...

    Windows 7: Vista minus the nagging |
    Barman58's Avatar Posted By: Barman58
    28 Nov 2008

  1. Posts : 4,364
    Windows 11 21H2 Current build

    Finally - someone else who agrees with me.
      My Computer

  2. Posts : 3,141
    Vista Ult 64 bit Seven Ult RTM x64

    Hello JG,
    If it was Vista without the nagging I wouldn't be using it, as Vista doesn't nag me that much. Libraries and the new taskbar are two things that I really like. Also the Aero Snap feature saves me time and trouble. Also boots 3X faster for me, although that's not a big deal to me as I'm seldom in that much of a hurry. Can't even get a cup of coffee before it's ready to go. This doesn't mean that it couldn't be Vista SP2. Hopefully there is more to come though. Just my opinion.

      My Computer

  3. Posts : 289
    Windows 7 7100 build

    I just used Windows 7 Beta with the unlock of superbar.

    Overall it just feels like vista with some eye candy improvements and at least in this build it is just not all that amazing...

    I do hope that people like this release and give it positive reviews because Microsoft sure needs it! But I am still more than happy with Vista.

    It just seems that if the first reviews give 7 positive review everyone will think it's a great OS because it should get rid of all those vista bashing people that never even used the OS, but because someone said it sucked I am going by that and telling everyone how much it blows...
      My Computer

  4. Posts : 30,948
    Windows 11 Pro x64 [Latest Release and Release Preview]
    Thread Starter

    I think that the title used for the article is not the best, but the views of a professional like Derek Melber is refreshing

    He has obviously used both Operating Systems and thought about the use of UAC in real world situations, Unlike most of the people writing articles .

    I have never felt UAC to be nagging me, but informing me when I do something potentially dangerous, As stated in the article that is what you should expect as an Admin.

    The people who slate vista's UAC for the nagging are, I feel, often the same people were most vocal about the lack of security in windows. They have to realise that security has a price to pay in terms of convenience.

    In Windows 7 Microsoft have given the control of the UAC to the Admin so as to let them make an informed choice.

    Vista was revolutionary in lots of ways, Windows 7 is less so but, in my opinion, that is what is needed.
      My Computers

  5. Posts : 748
    Vista and now 7 in 32 and 64 bit.

    LOL. I clicked the last feedback entry and Avast found malware there.
      My Computer

  6. Posts : 30,948
    Windows 11 Pro x64 [Latest Release and Release Preview]
    Thread Starter

    Yes Dave, I just checked myself and with me it doesn't even get to Avast, Firefox blocks it, not a good advert for CNN which is where it supposedly comes from.

    Good to see my trackback worked though helps spread the news of the SevenForums must remember to use them on anything else I quote
      My Computers

  7. Posts : 748
    Vista and now 7 in 32 and 64 bit.

    I make no pretence. I don't doubt for one moment that the UAC offers another obstacle in the path of malware attack. I run, as has been , automatically, the case in legacy OS's, as the global Administrator. With back up images, and as a private user, I see no great risk in this. With the help of good third party malware protection, I feel as secure as needs be. I have never, over the years of personal computer use, been subjected to any attack, threatening or in what the hackers would call "fun", that could not easliy be dealt with.
    I think initially, the problem, and the quick solution (disabling or just double clicking) was so widely publicised that now, it has become a reflex action for most users. Any parents reading these pages must agree. My eight year old granddaughter quickly circumvents the prompt. ( On a computer setup for her use!) With antivirus, or malware control, it can be unobtrusive enough that the user is not even aware that destructive action is being forestalled.
    Another problem was one of authoritative manner in which the UAC ws imposed. It is distressing for a new user, maybe not too knowledgeable to pay a deal of money for the right of sole use, only to find, after installation, that he does not even have full rights to the damned computer. As, I believe, in Linus releases (I havn't looked at those for a while) it would have been polite and businesslike of Microsoft to have given full global Adminstartative rights to the user, with a very large print warning, toeard the end of the install, that it would be in the best security interests of the user to enable both a username as a standard user, and the UAC, as an option.
    There is, on observation at my lower level of knowledge, a contardiction of terms glossed over in the blog
    "!Most administrators have a single user account, which has membership in the Domain Admins or worse, Enterprise Admins, group. When browsing the Internet, performing routine tasks, checking e-mail, etc., if the user has administrative privileges, so does the malware, virus, or other malicious code that is running without the administrator’s knowledge.
    Windows Vista eliminates risk by forcing all users — administrators and end-users alike — to run as a “standard user.”"

    I have two Network Adminstrators in my family. Both of their employers are up to date and employ Vista. I have not queried it with them, but I would imagine that, at least for a great deal of the time, they find it neccessary to operate as Global Admins with full priviliges. They would not, therefore , see the comparative advantage of Vista over, say, XP. - But maybe Ive got that wrong?
      My Computer

  8. Posts : 30,948
    Windows 11 Pro x64 [Latest Release and Release Preview]
    Thread Starter

    Hi dave

    The Administrator, at least as I was taught when I started out, on business networks always used to run with two accounts, one full admin plus global admin rights, and a standard user which was their default login.

    If they needed to perform an operation that needed elevated rights then they would temporarily log into their Admin account by the use on the "Runas" (on windows systems), or the "SU" or "SUDO" commands, (on Unix or Linux systems)

    the only recent Linux experience I have is with ubuntu which automatically follows this method on installation, where commands requiring Root privilege being accessed by the use of the sudo command. If you wish to circumvent this in Linux it is a lot more difficult than it is in vista

    What UAC does for an admin used to this working practice is partly automate this process.

    Unfortunately the model for chosen for windows when the NT series was introduced was to make the first user automatically an admin - and has led to the current practice (pre-vista) to run as this user at all times. This has led in turn to software developers assuming that the user will have full admin rights and writing the software accordingly.

    With the vast increase in malware around toward the end of the XP era and the calls for vista to be "more Secure" Microsoft implemented UAC. Due in a lot of cases 3rd party software still expecting the user to be at full admin level the amount of "false" UAC prompts has been way too high and has led to the click through or disable attitude that prevails today.

    I have problem with the experienced user like yourself who, Knowing the potential risks chooses to run as full admin all the time on your own machine. The problem all the bloggers instructing the new users who don't know the dangers to do so.

    It would be interesting to canvas the opinions of your "family admins" to see the way that they work, I am old school in my training but a lot of admins these days do run as full admin all the time.

    anyway I've rambled on enough and never forget though I may express my opinions on a few subjects on the Forums here they are only my opinions and I may be wrong
      My Computers

  9. Posts : 748
    Vista and now 7 in 32 and 64 bit.

    My previous post "They would not, therefore , see the comparative advantage of Vista over, say, XP."
    I'm not sure, but I think you are, in part, agreeing with my thoughts on Network Admin use?
      My Computer

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:17.
Find Us