Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser market share has dipped to a historic all-time-low in April, at under 60 percent, according the latest NetApplications statistics. Internet Explorer's losses are at the expense of Mozilla's Firefox and Google's Chrome browser which continue to grow more popular.
1. Most secure
2. Fastest
3. Not that easy to use
4. Many other reasons.
Fact is that Microsoft does not update IE as much as Firefox, Chrome, etc and they always seem to be one step behind the rest.
If Microsoft really cares they will go the same route of the others so they can really compete in the market and keep that market share up. Until then bye bye IE!!
System Manufacturer/Model Number: Toshiba L505 OS: Windows 7 64x CPU: AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile M520 2.30 GHz Memory: 4GB Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4200
Not surprising at all. I have not used IE as my primary browser since the days of IE 6.
Unfortunately for Microsoft, they took their market share for granted since IE came with Windows. For several years, MS did little development with IE except for security concerns. Then the upstart Firefox came came along and shocked MS out of it lethargy. MS has been playing catchup ever since while the market share continues to erode.
To me, looking at IE 7 and IE 8, IE developers were concentrating on bell and whistles instead of speed and security that the market wants.
System Manufacturer/Model Number: Home built OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz Motherboard: ASUS P4P800-VM Motherboard Chipset: Intel 865G + ICH5 Memory: 2.50 GB RAM Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS Sound Card: SoundMax Integrated Digital Audio (Chip) Monitor(s) Displays: ViewSonic VX 1962 wm Screen Resolution: 1680 X 1050 Keyboard: Microsoft Comfort Curve Keyboard 2000 v10 USB Mouse: Logitec optic USB Cooling: Fan based Hard Drives: Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 80 GB
ST380215A ATA Device 18.6 GB
Western Digital "My Book" external hard drive 750 GB Internet Speed: 3.01 Mb/s download 0.64 Mb/s upload
As a new IE user, I find that they are trying to run off Firefox by making it display worse that IE. I did so prefer to use firefox. I lost the ability to magnify my home page to see it better.
Internet Explorer 9 better be kick a** and come out soon if Microsoft wants to regain the browser market.
I'm not sure if it would help that much. I quit using IE back around the IE6 days. While I have had boxes with IE7 and IE8 along the way...I've never really given either the time of day as I just prefer what I am used to...which is firefox. I'm sure there are others like me.
MS dragged their feet doing nothing for far too long. I switched when other browsers had built-in pop up blockers and then tabbed browsing. Just about anything that MS introduces in the browser market was available form others prior.
Not surprising at all. I have not used IE as my primary browser since the days of IE 6.
Unfortunately for Microsoft, they took their market share for granted since IE came with Windows. For several years, MS did little development with IE except for security concerns. Then the upstart Firefox came came along and shocked MS out of it lethargy. MS has been playing catchup ever since while the market share continues to erode.
To me, looking at IE 7 and IE 8, IE developers were concentrating on bell and whistles instead of speed and security that the market wants.
Just my opinion as a consumer.
Sure enough Carl :)
windows7user said:
Internet Explorer 9 better be kick a** and come out soon if Microsoft wants to regain the browser market.
Actually, I dread the day when IE 9 will be released. Being a web developer, I'm sick and tired of writing the same code twice, one version for Chrome, Firefox, Safari and another version for IE (especially IE7, IE8 sometimes joins in with the other three)
Actually, I dread the day when IE 9 will be released. Being a web developer, I'm sick and tired of writing the same code twice, one version for Chrome, Firefox, Safari and another version for IE (especially IE7, IE8 sometimes joins in with the other three)
I'm with you on that. Would be nice if they could all agree on how to handle and render the same code.