New
#181
I'll get some scores up later, but I thought I'd share results from a personally witnessed 'a why OC/what benefit' point of view.
I was using ARMA 2/Benchmark 1 to test. (Arma is far more CPU intensive than GPU.)
I had fraps going and it gives you the 'average' at the end.
On stock clocks, the average FPS was 42.
Turbo Enabled, 4 GHZ single core, 3.8GHZ all cores, average 43
At 4.7GHZ, average 52 FPS
While I watched these runs, the frames really chugged on stock and turbo. At 4.7ghz, the min frames were up to 15FPS higher on average.
(I also did a couple of OCed GPU card runs and the increase was about 3FPS.)
So yeah, an average 10+FPS jump on an OCed chip. In game, this results in a higher average/min frame rate with less slow down.
Not all games will show a distinct improvement with a CPU OC, but for those that do... worth it.
Thanks mate.
Benchies are fun to pass time(when they work), compare changes etc - But yep, real world improvement is my personal point to OCing.
*Anyone using 3DM11 under 8? It keeps erroring on me. I think it might be do with the framework.
EDIT:
*sigh* It is a.NET framework issue. PITA![]()
Nice increase mate
Where can i get the benchmark? i play a lot of arma but still have'nt managed to get my settings right lol
Not bad tw33k.
This is where I am right now, I have not really done much fiddling, I am pretty sure the Vcore can be a little lower but it's running well and temps are ok.
The shot I posted was 10 mins into prime.
Edited to add, I am using Arctic Silver 5.