New
#1
Overclock advice wanted: Which first, multiplier or FSB?
Hi all,
I managed to resist the lure of Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge and remained somewhat content with my Core 2 Duo E8500 (overclocked to 4.2GHz). Lately, however, I become a bit unhappy with my gaming performance and bought a Core 2 Quad Extreme QX9650. Yes, I know that it's "obsolete" but it was the cheapest "upgrade" I could perform while awaiting the release and reviews of Haswell.
Currently it's running at 3.33GHz (333x10) as I only changed the multiplier but not the voltages. This works great and the quad core has given a real boost to those games that are optimized for multiple cores. I see much better performance in Far Cry 3 and Borderlands 2, for example. But, I see a decrease in performance in Torchlight II as it's not optimized for multiple threads. In a large battle I'll see the frame rate drop to 7fps. Yep, that's right, single digit, 7.
I've read quite a bit on the Overclocking websites (some of it contradictory) so my question is in what order should I be experimenting? Should I go for maximum FSB first or maximum multiplier? On the E8500 I had no choice, it had to be FSB and I really think that I just lucked into a good, stable overclock. I'm leaning towards the FSB maximization as that should give me an overall system boost but I'm just not sure if that's the right way to go.
I need some guidance from the experienced hands.