FX 8350 - Inaccurate Core Temperature

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 3,487
    Win 7 Pro x64/Win 10 Pro x64 dual boot
    Thread Starter
       #11

    There is a new BIOS version out. I'll give that a try before I post the temps at the HWinfo64 forum.

    Thanks for the idea.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #12

    There is no way on Gods green earth that the Socket temp is that low vs core if anything that socket should be 5c above core
    You can try a new bios that should correct it
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 3,487
    Win 7 Pro x64/Win 10 Pro x64 dual boot
    Thread Starter
       #13

    Solarstarshines said:
    There is no way on Gods green earth that the Socket temp is that low vs core if anything that socket should be 5c above core
    You can try a new bios that should correct it
    I think you have it backwards. It's the core temp that's way too low, but I get your meaning.

    Trying a new BIOS tonight.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #14

    I was reading the Hardware info one i just now seen the core temp one lol

    The core temp socket was at 37c while cpu was 25c 17c correct

    Now Hardware info boosted the Socket to 51c and cpu 36c 5.1c a lot lower that is the one i read
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 3,487
    Win 7 Pro x64/Win 10 Pro x64 dual boot
    Thread Starter
       #15

    Well, I updated to the most recent BIOS, but the problem remains:

    FX 8350 - Inaccurate Core Temperature-capture71.png

    I really can't figure this out. It must be a fault in the chip or the stepping version.

    I think I'll just use 20 degrees as a rule of thumb when I OC this rig. It might be a little high, but I'll be safer that way.

    Buying Intel next time...
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #16

    To be honest might be the MOBO it's not a 990fx board a lot of boards boast FX but they are revised and aren't really made for it that could be the issue here
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #17

    Question what is your HT speed with that chip 2600 or 2400 ?
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 3,487
    Win 7 Pro x64/Win 10 Pro x64 dual boot
    Thread Starter
       #18

    Solarstarshines said:
    To be honest might be the MOBO it's not a 990fx board a lot of boards boast FX but they are revised and aren't really made for it that could be the issue here
    I hadn't thought of that. It could very well be the mobo. This isn't exactly top of the line and maybe the FX support isn't all it's cracked up to be, like you say.

    I think I'll look around at some Intel hardware for my next upgrade. :)
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 3,487
    Win 7 Pro x64/Win 10 Pro x64 dual boot
    Thread Starter
       #19

    Solarstarshines said:
    Question what is your HT speed with that chip 2600 or 2400 ?
    It's at its default of 2200. I never change it until I've set my main clock speed/multiplier. There's a sweet spot/ratio that you have to follow, according to some guides that I read.

    EDIT: According to CPU World, it's supposed to be 2600, but I'm having memory stability issues that I'm trying to resolve, so for right now it will stay at auto.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 7,466
    Windows 10 Home Premium 64bit sp1
       #20

    Mellon Head said:
    Solarstarshines said:
    Question what is your HT speed with that chip 2600 or 2400 ?
    It's at its default of 2200. I never change it until I've set my main clock speed/multiplier. There's a sweet spot/ratio that you have to follow, according to some guides that I read.
    I knew it that isn't the default HT for that chip it's 2600 the mother board is the issue Proper Default NB and HT link speed
    That motherboard has lowered the real value of that chip and may be overvolting it as well i only stuck with the boards that were made with the chips the other one's don't control them well
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:43.
Find Us