Show Us Your WEI

ZaLiTH said:

Dave76 said:

Not that is matters to us, just thought this was interesting tid-bit of info.

The Serial ATA International Organization AKA SATA-IO, is kind of picky about what SATA gets called. In fact we have already broken its rules in the paragraphs above more than once.

When referring to the specification, use "Serial ATA Revision 3.0 specification" for the first reference. For successive references, this can be shortened to "SATA Revision 3.0." Do not use "SATA 3.0." When referring to transfer rates, the technology can be correctly referred to as "SATA 6Gb/s."

Ah, yes of course.. I wasn't thinking properly, I do know about the naming protocols used, I just keep forgetting to actually stick to them.

Then again, this whole naming thing can be just as confusing to some people as GB vs Gb.. And that's not even getting into the differences between a gigabyte and a gibibyte... I really hate computers sometimes. Lol.

I had a nice laugh when I read that article.

How about SATA slow, SATA fast and SATA faster... nah,

Or, SATA slug, SATA coyote and SATA Road Runner...

What's a guy gonna have to do to get an 8.......

Overclock the SSDs, bump the vcore and timing multiplier.

Cant go up to 8.0 only goes up to 7.9

mbreslin said:

I have 8 sata 6gb/s ssds in raid 0 and I still can't get an 8.0 hdd score.


(joke)

Crispy said:

Cant go up to 8.0 only goes up to 7.9

mbreslin was making a (joke), mate

You know Intel and MS are pretty tight, I think they made a deal to get you guys to upgrade to the highest processor available.

Don't worry, by the end of the year they'll surely have a processor that can get an 8....

ya I new you where jokeing.