What's your memory assessment speed?


  1. Posts : 363
    windows 7 Pro x64
       #1791

    profdlp said:
    As an experiment, I would try removing the two 1GB modules and see if you notice a difference in speed. If you look at the numbers they are lower in rated speed, but better (lower number is good here) in CAS Latency.

    Run a few benchmarks that way and see how the numbers compare with having all four sticks in there. I would also keep in mind that how you use your computer is more important than just a benchmark score. If you regularly do things that require a lot of RAM, 6GB instead of 4GB would be better, even if it runs a wee bit slower. If you regularly do things that require fast RAM, 4GB instead of 6GB would be better, even if you don't have quite as much of it. :)
    OK, witch benchmark should I use

    I use my machine at is maximum. I don't play game, but I have 4 screens and I display charts with lots of calculation. Excel is use for External communication and applications controls. So yes, I do use a lot of ram

    Martin
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 26,870
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1792

    Go to start, in the search box type cmd, in the entry that comes up, right click it and select run as administrator. In the window that comes up, type winsat mem post a screenshot of the result. Both ways.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 363
    windows 7 Pro x64
       #1793

    essenbe said:
    Go to start, in the search box type cmd, in the entry that comes up, right click it and select run as administrator. In the window that comes up, type winsat mem post a screenshot of the result. Both ways.
    here is the result

    Martin
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What's your memory assessment speed?-winsat-6-gig.gif   What's your memory assessment speed?-winsat-4.gig.gif  
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 26,870
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1794

    The higher number is better
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 363
    windows 7 Pro x64
       #1795

    essenbe said:
    The higher number is better
    So it was faster with 6 gig than with 4 gig

    Is it normal?
    Is it possible that my 4 gig bank is slower than my 2 gig? With GPU-Z, both show 400 MHz

    On my board, I got 4 slots
    Yellow Black Yellow Black

    Actually, my 2 memory stick are placed on both yellow slots

    Martin :)
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 26,870
    Windows 11 Pro
       #1796

    Some boards are nore demanding thatn othere. Look in your manual and see which slots they recommend you pitting the 2 sticks in. They will be the same color slots which will enable dual chanel mode. It will be either the 2 sticks in the yellow slots or the black slots. But, you will see little difference in the performance of the machine with faster memory.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 29
    Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64
       #1797

    Here's what I have on my notebook.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What's your memory assessment speed?-capture.jpg   What's your memory assessment speed?-capture2.jpg  
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 49
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
       #1798

    Mine.

    What's your memory assessment speed?-winsat_mem.jpg
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #1799

    arjfca said:
    essenbe said:
    The higher number is better
    So it was faster with 6 gig than with 4 gig

    Is it normal?
    Is it possible that my 4 gig bank is slower than my 2 gig? With GPU-Z, both show 400 MHz
    Your Kingston 2x2GB kit has a cas Latency of 6-6-6-18-24
    (They look like the 'value' range)

    And your 2x 1GB modules have a lower Cas latency of 5-5-5-18-23
    (Which is better. The lower the Cas latency, the quicker the RAM)

    Basically your two individual 1GB sticks are faster than your 2x2GB kit. The 2x2GB sticks are bringing the score down.




    Realistically, you've got two options:

    Option One:

    Try to 'tighten' the timings of your 2x2Gb kit.

    (The slower kit. Tightening means adjusting the default Cas latency speeds to a lower and faster number.)

    Ie instead of the 2x2GB kit running at 6-6-6-18-24, lower them to 5-5-5-18-24

    Test for stability using memtest+.


    If Unstable at those timings, try something like 5-6-6-24 etc.

    If the kit runs stable at 5-5-5-24 or 5-6-6-24, add the other two 1GB sticks.

    When all sticks are in use (6GB) they all run at the speed of the 'lowest' module. That's why you can try to 'tighten' the timings of the 2x2GB kit to improve speed.



    Option Two:

    Just use the 6GB as you have been doing. The speed difference, whilst there - is not going to be 'Wow - it runs like a rocket now'.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #1800

    I'm voting for Option Two, above.

    arjfca said:
    profdlp said:
    arjfca said:
    ...Does it give a clue for the pertinence to upgrade or overclock memory

    Martin
    Go to the SPD tab and post a screenshot for each slot. :)
    Done

    Martin :)

    Your 'Memory' tab shows your RAM (6GB) running at 5-6-6-15 and 2T.

    The SPD tabs show you the JEDEC settings, which are a standard used by the manufacturer to give the timing settings that the RAM 'should' work at, this info is also used by the BIOS to set the RAM when in Auto mode.

    Since the 'Memory' tab information isn't the same as any SPD tab, someone has set it at these timings.
    When you have two different RAM cards, with different SPD timings, they will use the SPD timings from the lower card (the higher numbers).

    Your RAM is likely set at the best speed and timings already.
    Unless you are getting errors or crashes, then just leave it as it is now.

    Any small increase in performance gained by tightening timings (adjusting for more performance) will not be noticeable on your system.

    Since you already have a SSD, it should be performing well.

    The only noticeable performance increase you can do would be a new CPU, motherboard and RAM, like a i5/i7 system.
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57.
Find Us