New
#141
Samsung 800 mhz DDR2. Nothing impressive.
Samsung 800 mhz DDR2. Nothing impressive.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7077]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Windows\system32>winsat mem
Windows System Assessment Tool
> Running: Feature Enumeration ''
> Run Time 00:00:00.00
> Running: System memory performance assessment ''
> Run Time 00:00:05.15
> Memory Performance 7758.22 MB/s
> Total Run Time 00:00:07.11
C:\Windows\system32>
4gig ddr2 8000Mhz
so do the E or Q series 775's play a role in acting as a 'memory controller'? or is it just the design of the new i7's?
i have seen others with lower spec ram hitting around the same if not better on DDR2
as for o.cing it does not make much difference, i experimented with that already. 8/8/8/24 1800 t2 running at 8/7/6/16 1801 t2 with stock 1.9v interleaved dual channel, 100% stable with those settings even with memtest,p95,intel b.t. LinX.
although im happy with the way its running even on a beta o.s. its flawless, just sound and minor sli issues remaining.
but like anyone, if you know it could be performing better, you want it!
cheers
Rick
EDIT two prime examples posted below...meh amd cpus...nice scores btw! i am extremely jealous
Last edited by bloke; 18 Apr 2009 at 11:42.
Kingston ddr2 1066 @ 1103mhz 2GB 5-5-5-18 I believe.
jb2zero0six5 i have the same RAM but,
Interesting... I'll rerun it, test doesn't seem consistant at all..
1. 11621.70
2. 11552.65 ?
3. 11572.50
4. 11513.90 ??
I guess I don't get it. lol
Oh, ram timings are at 1103 @ 2.2v 5-5-5-15 now.