New
#11
LOL, sorry about that! It was like 10 AM when I posted that, and I hadn't slept the night before. =X
I meant that I installed it on my desktop, and want to install it on my laptop.
As long as it runs equal to, or faster than Vista, I'll do it. :)
I plan on upgrading the RAM, but I probably wont be able to do it anytime soon.
I wanted opinions on if it would be wise to upgrade to W7. =X
I had concerns because I only have a gig of RAM, and most people recommend at least 2gb.
This is the link to the little test,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptzpBiEwjqo
Video is still processing so I don't know how it looks on youtube yet.
I played Starship Troopers DVD in Windows Media Center (used my MS Xbox 360 HD-DVD Drive) , installed Netflix plug-in, while browsing the web.
Then I played Netflix videos in Firefox since there was some odd error in Media Center when trying to load Netflix, it said the Daylight Savings time was incorrect and wouldn't let me log in.
the Mini isn't the fastest thing, but it gets the job done.
I still wouldn't use it. Check out the specs of my laptop - weight is under 1.6kg with adapter and plenty of power for anything except gaming.
@MrSparkle
Since you're already running Windows Vista, the change from Vista to Windows 7 isn't a big one. If you can get a free copy of Windows 7, by all means upgrade. Windows 7 will not run any slower on a laptop that already has Vista installed. Windows 7 is not any lighter on resources when compared to Vista SP2, it's just feels snappier and more responsive when doing the same task. I would choose Windows 7 over Vista even with your laptop specs if I had the option.
Just make sure you upgrade the ram in the future to 2GB or more regardless of which option you choose, it'll make a big difference with both Vista and Windows 7.
Just about anything that will run vista will run windows 7, and the battery seems to last longer between charges. It's definitely lighter on the system, especially compared to factory default settings after reinstalling vista from the the recovery partition for a day just to get a contrast
@madtownidiot
I've done a lot of comparison with systems running both Vista SP2 and Windows 7 and I've found Windows 7 is not any lighter on resources. Maybe on your system because you did a system restore to factory setting from partition which maybe includes bloatware from the manufacture but in all other cases Windows 7 uses just about the same amount of resources as Vista SP2. Keep in mind, Vista SP2 installs default with 3 desktop gadgets and Windows 7 installs default without desktop gadgets.
Check online benchmarks and comparisons, they all say the same. My comparison is Vista SP2 vs Windows 7 RTM.
Overall, I would disagree, if it's using less power in windows 7 than in vista, it would be difficult to claim otherwise
Again, Windows Vista SP2 installs with balanced power plan as oppose to Windows 7 default installs to power saver power plan. Under the advanced tab in power plans you'll also find Windows 7 has minimum CPU at 5% and Vista SP2 defaults minimum 50% CPU, there are other advanced power options that have been changed in Windows 7 default install also. All these can be changed in both Windows 7 and Vista SP2 and make them use about the same amount of power.
Remember, Windows 7 is Windows 6.1 or Vista SPX. Windows 7 is just some interface changes changes along with bug fixes over Vista SP2 to get XP users to upgrade.