New
#11
I replied to you in the other post i made but this one is more active so ill just give the same reply so we can continue the conversation here.
Thanks for your reply and recommendation. I checked active out and it actually does seem better than recuva. Im actually doing a superscan right now as we speak. I like how the quick scan allows you to see deleted files on the hard drive by navigating to the folder(s) they were suppose to be in. However, it seems like the superscan doesn't have the ability to show the original location of a file.. Thats gonna make it very difficult and time consuming to find and put 1000s of wanted files back in their place out of a huge group of unwanted files. Im going to wait until the scan finishes to see how much more organized active can make these files but if you know something, please give me more advice.. Is there a way to know the original file location of the files superscan finds? Will the files have their original file name? Can you get into more detail on why you prefer active over recuva and stuff?