MBAM 3 Totally Useless Now

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 4,049
    W7 Ultimate SP1, LM19.2 MATE, W10 Home 1703, W10 Pro 1703 VM, #All 64 bit
    Thread Starter
       #11

    Layback Bear said:
    It's very strange how 3.0 works on so many system and doesn't work on others.
    I always found it strange that a lot of people had weird problems with Firefox.


    Other than the stupidly long start up time, MBAM 3 was working.

    I think that the last update broke it on my machines.

    When I checked my other PC, it couldn't even draw the interface correctly (the progress animation wasn't rendered at all). Scans were broken too.
    Last edited by lehnerus2000; 24 Apr 2017 at 20:28. Reason: Quote Added
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 52
    Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Build 7601 32bit
       #12

    Never had a single issue with MBAM 3 on either Win 7 SP1 Home Premium or Win 10 Home. I run this simultaneously with MSSE with no issues.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 4,049
    W7 Ultimate SP1, LM19.2 MATE, W10 Home 1703, W10 Pro 1703 VM, #All 64 bit
    Thread Starter
       #13

    Some people don't seem to have any problems with it.

    However, I've seen plenty of complaints about MBAM 3 and they usually match my experience:

    • Useless 24/7 Service
    • Ridiculous 30 second to 60 second startup time

    MBAM 2 doesn't display either of those issues.


    If the company purges those responsible for MBAM 3, I might consider installing MBAM 4 (assuming the MBAM 3 debacle doesn't wipe them out).
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 25,847
    Windows 10 Pro. 64/ version 1709 Windows 7 Pro/64
       #14

    To me a few seconds on boot does not over ride the security advantage of Malwarebytes 3.0.

    I have '3.0' on two machines and have notice a few seconds more when booting.
    No big deal as far as I'm concerned.

    Jack
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 4,049
    W7 Ultimate SP1, LM19.2 MATE, W10 Home 1703, W10 Pro 1703 VM, #All 64 bit
    Thread Starter
       #15

    Layback Bear said:
    To me a few seconds on boot does not over ride the security advantage of Malwarebytes 3.0.

    I have '3.0' on two machines and have notice a few seconds more when booting.
    No big deal as far as I'm concerned.
    A minute is not a few seconds.

    I used MBAM 3 from January to the end of April (despite the stupidly long startup time).

    Updating itself to a non-functional state was the final straw.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 1,872
    Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 8.1 Pro x64, Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1,
       #16

    Have you tried 3.1? I have had no issues with it at all.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 4,049
    W7 Ultimate SP1, LM19.2 MATE, W10 Home 1703, W10 Pro 1703 VM, #All 64 bit
    Thread Starter
       #17

    pbcopter said:
    Have you tried 3.1? I have had no issues with it at all.
    I heard about it just after I finished replacing v3 with v2.

    I did a brief search and I found people were still complaining about the same issues, so I didn't bother.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 233
    Windows 7 Home 64-bit
       #18

    In my opinion, MBAM shouldn't have fixed something that wasn't broken in the first place.

    If MBAM now promotes itself as an AV replacement, they should subject themselves to an independent and impartial testing (AV Comparatives) of their product like the rest of the security software that's on the market.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 1,606
    Windows `10 Professional 64bit
       #19

    I am pleased to say that I have six licenses and have no problems.

    BUT I had lots of problems at the beginning.

    Stay with it guys and gals.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 16
    Windows 7 Ult 32
       #20

    All 3 versions were uninstalled


    I tried a trial version on all three of my win 7 systems (2 ultimate 1 pro) with all updates and patches. All three machines corrupted their respective system restores, timed to MWAM installation. It was over a week of not knowing, and when found on one laptop I traced it to MBAM. I then tried a restore on the other 2, same issue. Tech support (two weeks worth) could not duplicate, so I uninstalled from all 3 and never looked back. All 3 running MSE without problems again. Very disappointed MBAM did this corruption of sys restore. Don't know where the source of the problem was, but if installing MBAM brought it to the surface, then MBAM had to go.
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:19.
Find Us