Windows 7 Forums
Welcome to Windows 7 Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find support and solutions for any problems regarding your Windows 7 PC be it Dell, HP, Acer, Asus or a custom build. We also provide an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Windows 7: rootkit

15 Aug 2010   #1

MS Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

i heard rootkits cant install themselves on 64 bit OS'S, is this true?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
15 Aug 2010   #2

Microsoft Community Contributor Award Recipient

Windows 10, Home Clean Install

Rootkit Finder - Find Rootkit in your computer!

Here is some informtion. Rootkits can enter any system.
64 and 32 should be equally vulnerable.

How they enter
and this
My System SpecsSystem Spec
15 Aug 2010   #3

MS Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

i dont have a rootkit, since i rarely dwnload anything, i was just wondering if it was true
My System SpecsSystem Spec

15 Aug 2010   #4

Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit

Rootkits can install themselves anywhere, including firmware and the system BIOS. 64-bit systems are definitely vulnerable.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
15 Aug 2010   #5

Windows 7 x64

My System SpecsSystem Spec
16 Aug 2010   #6

windows 7 ultimate 32 bit

Hi everyone, while googling the topic i found this " the current rootkits that have been written for 32 bit systems, including the infamous Sony music CD rootkit, don’t work in the 64 bit OS. That’s because when updating the kernel code for the 64 bit version, Microsoft programmers took the opportunity to include a “patch guard” – code that is part of the kernel makes it impossible to install a patch in a running kernel (which kernel mode rootkits do on 32 bit systems). Likewise, processor vendors had an opportunity, in making the new 64 bit processors, to include security mechanisms. Both AMD and Intel include code in their 64 bit products to prevent the exploitation of buffer overflow and buffer underrun conditions. " The full article is here Will upgrading to 64 Bit Windows make you More Secure? But i also think digitaly signed driver are not that hard to make for some " proffesional " malware author. malware writers currently tend to write their code for systems which enjoy widespread usage (such as 32bit Windows versions). More potential victims that way but its only a matter of time i guess.
My System SpecsSystem Spec


Thread Tools

Similar help and support threads
Thread Forum
I have a Gateway computer, 64 bit, DX4822-01, with Intel pentium E5300 Dual Core, 2.6GHZ each, 6GB ram, and 1TB HDD, running Windows 7 Home Premium x 64 bit. I've been getting a red warning on my screen that says I have (1) a Rootkit.Sirefef.spy and (2) a Trojan.fakAV-Download viruses. I've had...
System Security
I think I have a rootkit
I am almost positive that I have a rootkit. I know this because it has happened before. I tried both gmer and avast for rootkit removal and they both got so far and then froze up and had to force a shutdown of the programs. What should I do? I am in the middle of a semester right now and have a...
System Security
ZA Reg Rootkit???
cannot access the internet using any browser, need some help, see capture below: Diagnostic Report (1.9.0027.0): ----------------------------------------- Windows Validation Data--> Validation Code: 0 Cached Online Validation Code: N/A, hr = 0x8007043c Windows Product Key:...
System Security
Require (Rootkit.TDSS.TDL4) Rootkit Removal & Cleanup walkthrough
I would really appreciate some help from someone with experience with this matter. Introduction: Origin: False sense of security by AVG (updated), Windows kept updated, Browser settings, firewall, and self system maintainence. Presentation: Installed a 2nd HDD (Exclusively for daily...
System Security

Our Sites

Site Links

About Us

Find Us

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44.
Twitter Facebook Google+