Trojan.VB.VZO

This thread is good example of analysis in action. I hope that at least one reader has learned or refreshed a skill. We needn't be slaves to system or security utilities when careful examination of an error condition is equally effective. Thank you guys, Dark Assassin (+1 pending some spread) and DJGeneration (+1).

Mercurial said:

I'd say change your AV o.O;

Change what has been an excellent firewall and AV because of a single false positive? Much rather have several of those than a single false negative .

Antman said:

This thread is good example of analysis in action. I hope that at least one reader has learned or refreshed a skill. We needn't be slaves to system or security utilities when careful examination of an error condition is equally effective. Thank you guys, Dark Assassin (+1 pending some spread) and DJGeneration (+1).

Well, who am I to argue with such wisdom . Gotta say DA has been a great thread asset here. He gets mine!

Mercurial said:

I'd go with no false positive at all XD...

and I just can't understand antmant's posts it just requires lots of thinking X_X;

Just think of Antman as the Thinking Man's Thinking Man ...

Or as somebody once said,

The only difference between you & me is that I have the power of mind-over-matter, and you have no mind and it doesn't seem to matter ...

Well, you can't fool me, I've seen you thinking .

There is a singular quality of pride that a man, such as myself, is not often afforded the opportunity to feel -

If it ain't broke, your not working hard enough...
"You can always tell a programmer, you just can't tell him much." -Antman
proud novice java coder and beginner javascript coder

If only today was one of those days...

Thanks, damoh. Let's see where this ends up. I'm hoping for a false positive. OTOH, I've realized that my use of the installed software does not involve use of the OCX, so that may be why I haven't had any problems if it is indeed infected.