New
#1171
So strange that it works on two computers and ruins another computer using the same operating system.
Oh well,.....................
So strange that it works on two computers and ruins another computer using the same operating system.
Oh well,.....................
I've had no issues, they've had an update since then 3.0.5
Malwarebytes 3.0.5 Patch Release - now available - Malwarebytes 3.0 - Malwarebytes Forums
A Guy
Yep, perfect on two computers and destroyed my i5 machine.
Back to version 2 all is well.:)
Well this is discouraging, especially after using Malwarebytes Pro/Premium for many years. Windows 7 laptop (fully updated) froze about ten minutes into the installation of 3.0.5. When I checked the registry I found about 20 new Malwarebytes entries. Rather than edit the registry to clean things up I just used a system image and went back to 2.2.1.1043. Everything is working fine.
Tried installing 3.0.5 on my Windows 10 v1607. The install apparently worked but Malwarebytes did something to their coding and it's much more aggressive in removing what THEY consider to be PUPs.
Source: Malwarebytes gets tougher on PUPs | Malwarebytes LabsSeveral years ago, I blogged that we would be increasing how aggressive we would be in detecting Potentially Unwanted Programs (PUPs) and our fantastic malware intelligence and research teams have delivered on that promise. Last year, we removed approximately 500 million traces of PUPs per month!
In response, a lot of the PUP developers are making efforts to circumvent our criteria and continue distributing their damaging software to users. This is why we are getting even more critical about what we call a PUP, and what we are going to be detecting and removing from user systems.
Malwarebyes also decided to change their criteria on what constitutes a PUP.
Source: Malwarebytes | PUP Reconsideration Information & Request FormHere are some of the criteria we use:
- obtrusive, misleading, or deceptive advertising, branding, or search practices
- excessive or deceptive distribution, affiliate or opt-out bundling practices
- aggressive or deceptive behavior especially surrounding purchasing or licensing
- unwarranted, unnecessary, excessive, illegitimate, or deceptive modifications of system settings or configuration (including browser settings and toolbars)
- difficulty uninstalling or removing the software
- predominantly negative feedback or ratings from the user community
- diminishes user experience
- other practices generally accepted as riskware, scareware, adware, greyware, or otherwise commonly unwanted software by the user community
I have to ask, who made Malwarebytes king. Especially since it now flags and removed my ESET Online Scanner, SUPERAntispyware, and Sophos Virus Removal Tool; all of which have worked flawlessly side by side with 2.2.1.1023 as additional on-demand scanners. Once again a system image saved the day.
It's almost as though Malwarebytes is trying to be king of the hill. If any competitor tries to plant their own flag next to Malwarebyes, MB will just destroy the flag and push the participants off the hill. Not cool IMHO.
Always set it to warn user about detections, so it doesn`t delete it.
Then you can decide whether to get rid of whatever shows up.
There should never be anything on your PC unless you put it there anyway :)
I installed MMUltra Player on this AMD PC, and MBAM thought the installer was a PUP.
My fault for not removing the installer when I was done.
So there you can see why you wouldn`t want MBAM to automatically Quarantine an item, although you can just put the item back to where it was.
It won`t delete it until you tell it to. :)