Quad9 dns


  1. Posts : 3,788
    win 8 32 bit
       #1

    Quad9 dns


    This looks interesting use this dns Quad9 DNS: Internet Security and Privacy in a Few Easy Steps and it blocks bad websites YouTube
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 0
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #2

    Looks interesting, but being the type of person I am I like to check website IPs against Shodan and they have a whole pile of CVEs they need to fix. https://www.shodan.io/host/216.21.3.77

    So should I trust their infrastructure and what they offer? Looks promising, but for the time being I think I'll stick to OpenDNS which has a feature to resolve a domain even if it's down. Quad9 might be great for smartphones though.

    Edit-

    They didn't even set the right headers either. Mozilla Observatory
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 0
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #3

    I just tried hitting some malware domains and Quad9 does block them. But their ping time isn't as good as OpenDNS'.



    Code:
    C:\Users\Aaron>ping 9.9.9.9
    
    Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=56
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=56
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=56
    Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=56
    
    Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 42ms, Average = 41ms
    
    C:\Users\Aaron>ping 208.67.222.222
    
    Pinging 208.67.222.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=57
    Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=57
    Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=57
    Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57
    
    Ping statistics for 208.67.222.222:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 12ms
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 399
    Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit 7601
       #4

    Ping time isn't is not the best way to figure out what network is better, especially if your only interested in a single port like 53.



    This program would probably give you more accurate results.
    GRC's | DNS Nameserver Performance Benchmark


    Finding the closest DNS server to your location is the best way to pick a server, Usually that would mean your ISP but many people do not trust their ISP which is justified in some cases, For me I have found Cloudflare the fastest which is about 100km from where I live. There is also a quad9 about the same distance from me.


    A Google search should tell you what servers are near you:
    Code:
    Public dns server locations Canada
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 6,021
    Win 7 HP SP1 64-bit Vista HB SP2 32-bit Linux Mint 18.3
       #5

    samuria said:
    This looks interesting use this dns Quad9 DNS: Internet Security and Privacy in a Few Easy Steps and it blocks bad websites YouTube
    Very interesting video!
      My Computer


 

Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:52.
Find Us