Windows 7 Forums

Welcome to Windows 7 Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find support and solutions for any problems regarding your Windows 7 PC be it Dell, HP, Acer, Asus or a custom build. We also provide an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.


Windows 7: A True x64 Protection Suite :o ?

10 Mar 2010   #71
Terrorz

Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by canspec View Post
I have BitDefender Total Security-64-bit and it runs great!
Exactly if you read few posts back you will see I reccomended it to him. You should try BitDefender Total Security great poster.


My System SpecsSystem Spec
.
10 Mar 2010   #72
gamepoint

windows 7 professional x64 bit RTM
 
 

Bitdefender has very slow on-demand scanner i think
My System SpecsSystem Spec
10 Mar 2010   #73
Terrorz

Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by gamepoint View Post
Bitdefender has very slow on-demand scanner i think
You think, go do some research on it before you put an opinion on something which is most like a guess... Bitdefender came out as #1 AV on many sites... and kaspersky came second, they both or either first or second on most sites... and the scanner is not "very slow on-demand scanner" I know for a fact you never used it...
My System SpecsSystem Spec
.

10 Mar 2010   #74
gamepoint

windows 7 professional x64 bit RTM
 
 

chillax man....i used Bitdefender before..and compared to avast..Bitdefender do have slower scanning speed..My bad for the used of the word "very"..but look at this attachment..at section "scanning speed"..both free AV like avast and avira have better scanning speed than Bitdefender..


Attached Files
File Type: pdf avc_report23.pdf (375.0 KB, 5 views)
My System SpecsSystem Spec
10 Mar 2010   #75
Terrorz

Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by gamepoint View Post
chillax man....i used Bitdefender before..and compared to avast..Bitdefender do have slower scanning speed..My bad for the used of the word "very"..but look at this attachment..at section "scanning speed"..both free AV like avast and avira have better scanning speed than Bitdefender..
Whenever I scanned my PC it wasnt slow it was normal... but yea it depends on the PC if the scan will be slow or not... but yea BitDefender has high detection rates to find viruses.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
10 Mar 2010   #76
Great Poster

Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit English
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Terrorz View Post
Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by gamepoint View Post
Bitdefender has very slow on-demand scanner i think
You think, go do some research on it before you put an opinion on something which is most like a guess... Bitdefender came out as #1 AV on many sites... and kaspersky came second, they both or either first or second on most sites... and the scanner is not "very slow on-demand scanner" I know for a fact you never used it...
Yup, I too read many reviews. Bitdefender has great scan times. It does not scan files that it once scanned. Seems like winning formula.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
10 Mar 2010   #77
Fringe

slackware
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Great Poster View Post
Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Fringe View Post
can we get a link to the white paper so people can be on the same page as you are
I do not think you are programmer, so you won't directly unnderstant the whitepapers. Read this version though. The exploit still exists in Win 7 : BizTech: What's New: Windows Vista Kernel Patch Protection (a.k.a. PatchGuard)
i code mostly in asm / c. i understand the woes of x64 and even more into the idiosyncrasy of the differnet architectures

malware of type II and III can easily "bypass" patchguard. Plus PG was designed to keep legal programs from acting like rootkits. Not to detect malicious code --- keep the robots doing what robots do best

Mircosoft has pg in place to stop the AV vendors from using the same kernel hooking techniques that malware and rootkits use! Forcing them to document there techniques is only helping the rootkit makers

For the most part once it gains access to the kernel, its the supreme ruler of the land. Not always the case since the AV vendor is using the same or similar hooking technique
My System SpecsSystem Spec
10 Mar 2010   #78
Great Poster

Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit English
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by canspec View Post
I have BitDefender Total Security-64-bit and it runs great!
Can you give a comprehensive review with ram usage data, screenshots etc. It will be very helpful
My System SpecsSystem Spec
10 Mar 2010   #79
Great Poster

Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit English
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Fringe View Post
Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Great Poster View Post
Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Fringe View Post
can we get a link to the white paper so people can be on the same page as you are
I do not think you are programmer, so you won't directly unnderstant the whitepapers. Read this version though. The exploit still exists in Win 7 : BizTech: What's New: Windows Vista Kernel Patch Protection (a.k.a. PatchGuard)
i code mostly in asm / c. i understand the woes of x64 and even more into the idiosyncrasy of the differnet architectures

malware of type II and III can easily "bypass" patchguard. Plus PG was designed to keep legal programs from acting like rootkits. Not to detect malicious code --- keep the robots doing what robots do best

Mircosoft has pg in place to stop the AV vendors from using the same kernel hooking techniques that malware and rootkits use! Forcing them to document there techniques is only helping the rootkit makers

For the most part once it gains access to the kernel, its the supreme ruler of the land. Not always the case since the AV vendor is using the same or similar hooking technique
Good Analysis thumbs up !
My System SpecsSystem Spec
10 Mar 2010   #80
Great Poster

Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit English
 
 

Do not stop guys, let your inputs pour in ;-)
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

 A True x64 Protection Suite :o ?




Thread Tools




Similar help and support threads
Thread Forum
need to buy a new complete protection suite any recommendations?
Hey everyone, I have been using Eset SS5 and my license runs out in a couple of days. therefore it's that time again that I have to think do I stick with ESS or do I move to something else? I have heard fights over bitdefender total and kaspersky pure being the best I could get right now with no...
System Security
Nokia PC suite and Ovi suite
Hello friends what is diffrence between Nokia PC suite and Nokia OVI suite????
Software
True Image 2011 vs True Image 2010
I'm wondering exactly what improvements and changes have been made that might make it worthwhile to upgrade. I don't much care about cosmetic changes, only in those that actually make the program work better. I took a look at the Acronis website, but didn't find a change log, only literature to...
Software
Do I need a Suite?
I don't need Anti-Spam or System Utilities. I'm currently using KIS2k11, and I'm just wondering if I need the Suite, or am I better off using something like Avast.
System Security
pc suite
how can i load or run my 16bit programme cd on windows7 as i do not have 32bit pc suite cd sonyericsson{ k550i}:rolleyes:
Software
Is it true that they do this?
Ok so let me start by saying that I am building my own computer from parts that I will be ordering off newegg. The specs of my pc will be something along the lines of a 1tb hard drive, 4gb memory, phenom 2 quad core processor, and all the good stuff you need to make a ballin computer. Now, on...
Installation & Setup


Our Sites

Site Links

About Us

Find Us

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:38.
Twitter Facebook Google+ Seven Forums iOS App Seven Forums Android App