New
#1171
Yes well this discussion has gone on for as long as I can remember and really it does depend on who is typing thet stuff intot the machine because no AV is infallible simply because with 50K new malwares each day each one needs picking up and analyzing before it can be blocked and unless a staff member on the AV firm can move at near light speed then there will be a lot of stuff that goes merrily on it's way.
Personally I have had Kaspersky on six machines (and more ) over the last fives years and of course it misses stuff show me one that doesn't Those sites that do the testing would be using different techniques to find malware and anyone would always find differences in the results they put out. I go by AV Comparatives and Matousec simply because I find they are adequate and I really don't have the time or interest in chasing down the different testing sites.
Anyone who saw the recent documentary involving the Westboro church and Anonymous could plainly see nothing is safe even though we like to think so.
So really this is a topic that will have no actual outcome and it really has gone on for too long.
Again the only good AV is the user and when one sees what some do well iy really is no wonder we keep discussing this topic - in my link to Gizmo the sheer amount of AV stuff is staggering and there is still no absolute winner.
I would go on to ay that even Microsofy seem to have got in on the act now with Windows 10 and all that guff about privacy - so just how safe are you??