Question, which to be honest I could probably answer for myself with a little experimenting. But I'm hoping to get some insights from others faced with a similar problem, as to how they've addressed the problem... and if they may have a better solution than I've come up with.
My goal is to provide perhaps 2 or 3 generations of WindowsImageBackup (i.e. "system image") on one of my secondary local hard drive partition, which would be available in case of a system disaster to restore from. Since Win7 itself does not allow more than one per partition to exist (because of the high-level folder names), each time you run a new "system image" backup the old one on that partition gets deleted.
Obviously, I could rotate the target locations for the backups to three different partitions, but I don't have that luxury. I don't have enough free space that I am willing to dedicate to about a 46GB backup folder on other than one partition on one machine, or two partitions on a second machine (for "system image" on that second Win7 system).
So, on the one partition that I DO have some room on, I've simply renamed the current generation's high-level WindowsImageBackup folder to have a date-suffix on it. Then I run a new "system image" backup, creating a new folder with the standard Win7 name.
So far, so good... and I now actually have TWO "system image" backups on the one partition, physically anyway.
But if I go to restore, will both "system image" backups on that drive be visible in my list of choices for acceptable input to the backup? That would be true if I'd placed the two backups onto two separate partitions, and they would both appear in my selection list. But if they're both on the same drive but simply with different high-level folder names, will only the correctly named backup be presented as a choice? Will the renamed parent folder simply be ignored?
Obviously, underneath the two parent folders the sub-folder names and structure of the two backups is clearly identical, starting with the first sub-folder being my "computer name". Should I have renamed that too, somehow?
Is all of this pointless, and Win7 will never look for anything but the one "officially named" set of high-level and sub-folders as acceptable input to the restore?
My disaster recovery plan would normally be to just use the latest version of the "system image" backup on that one partition which therefore would not require any "trickery" to use an older generation renamed backup on the same drive.
But if I had to I could boot using the Win7 installation DVD or repair disk, exit to a command prompt, rename the high-level folders so as to "promote" an older renamed generation to now have the proper name looked for by the restore function, and then exit back to do the repair... i.e. to restore the "system image" version I just got the correct name to by renaming.
This is why I've been doing what I've been doing, namely using a partition I have available with a fair amount of free space to be used for "system image" backups, and retaining several generations. And in truth, I haven't yet had a situation where using anything other than the most recent "system image" to restore from was not the right thing or the appropriate course of action.
That's the background, and my thoughts.
Will ALL of the multi-generations of "system image" backup be visible at restore time in the selection list, so that I really do NOT have to go through the rename trick to get what I want restored?
Is there a 3rd-party software solution that DOES provide for multi-generation of the exact same type of "system image" backup that I should be using instead of Win7's "system image"?
Open to any thoughts and insights.
Thanks.
My goal is to provide perhaps 2 or 3 generations of WindowsImageBackup (i.e. "system image") on one of my secondary local hard drive partition, which would be available in case of a system disaster to restore from. Since Win7 itself does not allow more than one per partition to exist (because of the high-level folder names), each time you run a new "system image" backup the old one on that partition gets deleted.
Obviously, I could rotate the target locations for the backups to three different partitions, but I don't have that luxury. I don't have enough free space that I am willing to dedicate to about a 46GB backup folder on other than one partition on one machine, or two partitions on a second machine (for "system image" on that second Win7 system).
So, on the one partition that I DO have some room on, I've simply renamed the current generation's high-level WindowsImageBackup folder to have a date-suffix on it. Then I run a new "system image" backup, creating a new folder with the standard Win7 name.
So far, so good... and I now actually have TWO "system image" backups on the one partition, physically anyway.
But if I go to restore, will both "system image" backups on that drive be visible in my list of choices for acceptable input to the backup? That would be true if I'd placed the two backups onto two separate partitions, and they would both appear in my selection list. But if they're both on the same drive but simply with different high-level folder names, will only the correctly named backup be presented as a choice? Will the renamed parent folder simply be ignored?
Obviously, underneath the two parent folders the sub-folder names and structure of the two backups is clearly identical, starting with the first sub-folder being my "computer name". Should I have renamed that too, somehow?
Is all of this pointless, and Win7 will never look for anything but the one "officially named" set of high-level and sub-folders as acceptable input to the restore?
My disaster recovery plan would normally be to just use the latest version of the "system image" backup on that one partition which therefore would not require any "trickery" to use an older generation renamed backup on the same drive.
But if I had to I could boot using the Win7 installation DVD or repair disk, exit to a command prompt, rename the high-level folders so as to "promote" an older renamed generation to now have the proper name looked for by the restore function, and then exit back to do the repair... i.e. to restore the "system image" version I just got the correct name to by renaming.
This is why I've been doing what I've been doing, namely using a partition I have available with a fair amount of free space to be used for "system image" backups, and retaining several generations. And in truth, I haven't yet had a situation where using anything other than the most recent "system image" to restore from was not the right thing or the appropriate course of action.
That's the background, and my thoughts.
Will ALL of the multi-generations of "system image" backup be visible at restore time in the selection list, so that I really do NOT have to go through the rename trick to get what I want restored?
Is there a 3rd-party software solution that DOES provide for multi-generation of the exact same type of "system image" backup that I should be using instead of Win7's "system image"?
Open to any thoughts and insights.
Thanks.
My Computer
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
- Home-built, two systems (1) and (2)
- OS
- Windows 7 Pro x64 (1), Win7 Pro X64 (2)
- CPU
- i5-3350p 3.1Ghz/6MB-cache (1); E8400 3.0Ghz/6MB-cache (2)
- Motherboard
- ASUS P8Z77-V Pro (1); ASUS P5Q3 (2)
- Memory
- 8GB PC3-12800 DDR3 (1); 4GB PC3-10600 DDR3 (2)
- Graphics Card(s)
- ATI HD7750 (1), (see TV cards); ATI R7 250 (2)
- Sound Card
- Realtek ALC892 HD Audio (1); Realtek ALC1200 HD Audio (2)
- Monitor(s) Displays
- Eizo HD2441W LCD, Eizo S2433W (1); Eizo 24" S2433W (2)
- Screen Resolution
- 1920x1200, 1920x1200 (1); 1920x1200 (2)
- Hard Drives
- (1) 1TB SATA-II (7200RPM), 2x2TB SATA-III (7200RPM), 250GB SATA-III (10000RPM) for OS; 2x2TB external USB 3.0
(2) 320GB SATA-II (7200RPM), 750GB SATA-II (7200RPM), 150GB SATA-II (10000RPM) for OS; 2TB external USB 3.0
- PSU
- Nesteq ECS-6001 600W (1); Nesteq ECS-5001 500W (2)
- Case
- Acousti-Case 360 (1) and (2)
- Cooling
- Noctua NH-U12P SE2 for CPU, 2x120mm case fans (1) and (2)
- Keyboard
- IBM PS/2 (1) and (2)
- Mouse
- Logitech MX Revolution wireless (1); Microsoft wired (2)
- Internet Speed
- 100mbps down / 10mbps up
- Antivirus
- Microsoft Security Essentials; Malwarebyte Anti-Malware Pro
- Browser
- Firefox
- Other Info
- Ceton InfiniTV 4-tuner cablecard-enabled TV card as well as Hauppauge HVR-2250 OTA/ATSC 2-tuner TV card in (1), running under Win7 WMC

