Is it true that Windows 7 or 8 user account password is a joke?

[dc2000]

I was under impression that the user account password security in Windows 7 or Windows 8 has been improved by Microsoft since the old days of Windows XP, and that it is now virtually impossible to bypass it... well, I thought so until I read this, or watched this.

Can someone confirm or deny that it is that easy to bypass someone's Windows user account password? If so, why even setting it up? It just makes life more complicated...

Also a follow-up question. If I use something like disc encryption (TrueCrypt), or Microsoft's own BitLocker, will it be as easy to get into my data too?

 

[Dude]

dc2000, nothing is 100% safe

 

[dc2000]

dc2000, nothing is 100% safe

Well, I agree. But this one is not even 10% safe. I think even my mom can follow those instructions to reset my Windows 8 password

 

[logicearth]

Lets cover something. Physical access to a machine, that computer is owned. No amount of security could Microsoft or any other vendor (say Apple) could do to protect it. However, forcibly removing a password from an account has the side effect of destroying access to any encrypted files, which if you do not have a recovery key those files are gone. The encryption is tied to a users password, changing it without going though the proper steps removes the ability to decrypt those files.

The fact of the matter is, users want to have accounts that don't require passwords, this there must be the ability for user account not to have a password. Thus it can be removed by force. There is no way to protect from that. Not that it would matter, if some one has physical access they could just take the HDD out and claim all data that way.

Bitlocker and TrueCrypt HDD encryption are designed to defend against physical access attacks like this.

And no, this is not a security hole or oversight. Being able to wipe out passwords has been easy enough for anyone with administrative power, or physical access. Hell, I've done it a few times at work when a user forgets their password. Few clicks in the User and Group control panel clears their password or change it to whatever.

This "Password reset hack" is not a hack, just script kiddies thinking they are big stuff. Speaking of which, it requires administrative power on the computer to change one file for another. So the attacker must already have access to an account with administrative power. You are on the other side of the air-tight-hatch. I wouldn't even need to do this "hack" to reset your password. They went the long way round.

 

[dc2000]

Lets cover something. Physical access to a machine, that computer is owned. No amount of security could Microsoft or any other vendor (say Apple) could do to protect it. However, forcibly removing a password from an account has the side effect of destroying access to any encrypted files, which if you do not have a recovery key those files are gone. The encryption is tied to a users password, changing it without going though the proper steps removes the ability to decrypt those files.

OK. Good point. So at least my HDD files encrypted with BitLocked will not be that easily accessible, right?

 

[lehnerus2000]

Backup HDD Image

I'm not sure if this is the right way to phrase this.

If your files are encrypted, it is even more important to keep backup HDD images.

If your files aren't encrypted, there are easy ways to recover your data if there is a Windows OS problem (e.g. use a Live Linux CD/DVD).

 

[King Arthur]

The way I view user passwords on Windows, I consider them adequate to keep out the random passerby that might stumble across my computer by accident. Against an actually serious threat though? I don't even consider user passwords as even existing, far more effective to concern myself with stuff like NATs and firewalls against network attacks and encryption against local attacks.