Microsoft seeking feedback for Internet Explorer 9

[Fizban]

2. Overall speed is not even close as fast as Safari or Firefox in overall internet viewing from what I have noticed.

IE isn't that slow compared to Firefox. That's because Firefox is a dog though. Both IE and Firefox drag behind Opera in terms of speed, and opera drags far, far behind Safari and Chrome.

 

[zigzag3143]

IE feedback

personally I use Firefox. I also noticed quite a few IE installs where connectivity was lost because of the "automatically detect settings". that in itself would be reason not to use it until fixed

Ken

 

[matt_0978]

Remember tabs from last session. this is much needed.

Ye, it offers to restore ur tabs after an unexpected shutdown so shudn't be too hard for them to implement this as users choice

I think the ability to have a different appearence (skins) would be nice, I also agree on the pausing downloads as well as the remember tabs from last session.

anyone remember hotbar? the idea was good, maybe M$ shud buy 'em out??

Buy firefox and relabel it as IE 9

+10 :roflmao:

 

[PotatoMan83]

bookmark by number 1-9

 

[Burgurne]

See 2 tabs at the same time. Let user select 1 or 2 startpage(s) in each tap
Pause/resume downloads
let user set a download speedlimit pr tab, giving better scaling when downloading from severel places at the same time

For me FF is more confusing than IE because of the great numbers of plugin that it needs, and that activeX objects can't be used, not even in its own thread.

 

[zigzag3143]

IE feedback

See 2 tabs at the same time. Let user select 1 or 2 startpage(s) in each tap
Pause/resume downloads
let user set a download speedlimit pr tab, giving better scaling when downloading from severel places at the same time

For me FF is more confusing than IE because of the great numbers of plugin that it needs, and that activeX objects can't be used, not even in its own thread.

Good ideas. what plugin's does firefox "need"?

Ken

 

[nowayback]

ie8 is very fast for me...faster then firefox ...seems to be a tie with google chrome, but i have many more toolbars oepning with ie8 which i want.
only problem is that my typed urls seem to get deleted now and then .

 

[saverio]

Hi there

IE9 should get back to basics

NO "pre defined" plugins, no stupid "Accelerators", etc etc.

The browser should just be a Browser -- no more and no less. That way it would be lightning fast.

Provide an API for any 3rd party plugins -- you'll kill 99% of viruses and nasties with this.

If people want to run scripts, adobe reader, multi media etc then this should be launched as a separate app -- not run from within the browser itself.

Cheers
jimbo

I say scrap the whole internet explorer thing and go back to the drawing board and develop a whole new one that is unrelated to the IE family. I think it is a terrible browser, has always been a terrible browser and will always be a terrible browser, especially when you consider it is developed by the biggest software company on the planet.

IE for me has always been like trying to drive the garden shed through narrow country lanes, slow and cumbersome.

I totally agree with both of you.

I look at I.E. and in the context of Windows 7 it really is the last vestige of the dinosaur that the old OS's had become, and like 7 it needs not an overhaul on what's there already, but a total redesign from the ground up.

Once again, back t obasics, look at what people actually do with their browsers rather than what they think they will do.

I'd love to see tabs that can be docked to display side by side for comparative viewing, or even better, torn free of the main window and dragged off the browser to create a window of it's own.

I'm not really interested in accelerators and complexities, I want a lightning fast browser, with tabs that is fully compatible and alows me to save a download, and if I need to go away perhaps pause and resume at a later time. A propper download client within the browser.

And a proper API would be excellent, as you say it would stop a lot of the nasties getting in, at the moment MS has been kind enough to leave the back gate open and the keys in the door for far too long.

Also on the subject of browsers and the Euro edition why doesn't MS just have a folder on the desktop with the .exe files for IE, safari, FF, Chrome etc and then it can say that the choice is there all along. A little presentation from each of the mfrs pitching their product's plus points and there you go, MS proactively giving choice, and therefore, taking the wind out of the whingers sails .

 

[Black Antitoon]

My suggestion is to stop developing Internet Explorer, and gradually fade it out from Windows, the same way they did for winhlp32.exe. First stop developing it, then remove it making it available from their website, then stop even supporting it. The money or the man power wasted (because it's a waste) on IE could be better spent on other stuff, like the development of Windows. Windows 7 is good, but it could be even better if they didn't waste their time and money developing IE 8.

 

[Sven]

Also on the subject of browsers and the Euro edition why doesn't MS just have a folder on the desktop with the .exe files for IE, safari, FF, Chrome etc and then it can say that the choice is there all along. A little presentation from each of the mfrs pitching their product's plus points and there you go, MS proactively giving choice, and therefore, taking the wind out of the whingers sails .

That is what the EU-guys wanted Microsoft to do, but Microsoft choosed to remove the browser instead. Why should Microsoft spend time and money advertising for their competitors? I can fully understand MS in this.

Good ideas. what plugin's does firefox "need"?

Ken

Spellchecking in my language (at least the version I tried), security plug-in for my homebanking as FF don't support ActiveX.

 

[saverio]

I suppose you're right Sven, but also I'm not saying that they should advertise, just include. If nothing else initial studies and info fedback would provide them with data of exactly which one is installed, and therefore allow then=m to home in on the why's and benefits of a particular browser - and make IE a better product because of it.

 

[Muad Dib]

I suppose you're right Sven, but also I'm not saying that they should advertise, just include. If nothing else initial studies and info fedback would provide them with data of exactly which one is installed, and therefore allow then=m to home in on the why's and benefits of a particular browser - and make IE a better product because of it.

MS is not going to advertise for or promote their competition.

What happened in the EU battle was the "law of un-intended consequences".

Suppose MS had compromised and allowed a selection of browsers for the user? Let's say FF, Opera and Safari..... then along comes Chrome so MS must include Chrome or get sued.... then along comes "Browser ABC" created by 3 guys in a garage. Now MS must include that or get sued again....

MS made the right call and chose not to expose themselves to even MORE anti-trust/monopoly lawsuits.