Win 7 SP1 fails with 800B0100 error

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

  1. Posts : 23
    Windows 7 Proffessional 64 bit
       #11

    Right, will try that. Thanks. Shan't interfere with your thread from here on out.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 21,482
    Win 7 x64 Home Premium (and x86 VirtualBox VM)/Win10
    Thread Starter
       #12

    Success!
    SP1 is now installed :)
    Hopefully the updates will follow OK.
    (That was one of the longest install times I've seen for SP1 - 90 minutes!. TrustedInstaller peaked at 634MB, and the first reboot produced 115552 updates)

    I'll get the rest of the updates in (please?), and then defrag the machine for the first time ever
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 21,482
    Win 7 x64 Home Premium (and x86 VirtualBox VM)/Win10
    Thread Starter
       #13

    I think we can close this thread out now - the recommended updates for Windows installed without problems, and the only major Important one remaining is the Office 2007 SP2 (IE9 installed happily).

    Just to round it up a little, the cure for this appears to be

    1) run Fixit 50123 followed by Fixit 50202 in both normal and aggressive modes

    and/or

    2) install SP1 from the standalone, if the WU fails for any reason.
      My Computer


  4. JMH
    Posts : 7,952
    Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit. SP1.
       #14

    Well done to you!
    Safe surfing.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 21,482
    Win 7 x64 Home Premium (and x86 VirtualBox VM)/Win10
    Thread Starter
       #15

    Heh! - it's not even my PC :)
    Any sensible person would have flattened and rebuilt it - but I haven't been called sensible for a loooong time!
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 908
    Vista Home Premium x86 SP2
       #16

    NoelDP said:
    I think we can close this thread out now - the recommended updates for Windows installed without problems, and the only major Important one remaining is the Office 2007 SP2 (IE9 installed happily).

    Just to round it up a little, the cure for this appears to be

    1) run Fixit 50123 followed by Fixit 50202 in both normal and aggressive modes

    and/or

    2) install SP1 from the standalone, if the WU fails for any reason.
    Hello!

    Really sorry that I was so late to the party. On every case of the 0x800B0100 error code I have ever worked on, if no errors were detected, it was running the Fix-It in Aggressive Mode which fixed it. The reason lies in the CBS.log. Corrupt .mum or .cat files in winsxs caused errors in CheckSUR. If this was not the case, CBS.log always pointed to corrupt .cat/.mum files in the SoftwareDistribution folder, fixed by running Aggressive Mode of the aformentioned fix, which cleans out this temporary folder.

    Sorry I was late,

    Richard
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 21,482
    Win 7 x64 Home Premium (and x86 VirtualBox VM)/Win10
    Thread Starter
       #17

    niemiro said:
    On every case of the 0x800B0100 error code I have ever worked on, if no errors were detected, it was running the Fix-It in Aggressive Mode which fixed it. The reason lies in the CBS.log. Corrupt .mum or .cat files in winsxs caused errors in CheckSUR. If this was not the case, CBS.log always pointed to corrupt .cat/.mum files in the SoftwareDistribution folder, fixed by running Aggressive Mode of the aformentioned fix, which cleans out this temporary folder.

    Sorry I was late,

    Richard
    Thanks for the come-back!

    In this case, neither SFC nor CheckSUR reported problems, so I was a little at a loss as to how best to approach it - and I really wanted to avoid the inevitable history loss involved in running 50202 in aggressive mode.
    Beggars can't be choosers, though. I'm just happy I had a full set of SP1 standalones already on disk - downloading that amount on a dongle can get expensive, especially when the darn thing decides to change IP half-way through!
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 908
    Vista Home Premium x86 SP2
       #18

    NoelDP said:
    niemiro said:
    On every case of the 0x800B0100 error code I have ever worked on, if no errors were detected, it was running the Fix-It in Aggressive Mode which fixed it. The reason lies in the CBS.log. Corrupt .mum or .cat files in winsxs caused errors in CheckSUR. If this was not the case, CBS.log always pointed to corrupt .cat/.mum files in the SoftwareDistribution folder, fixed by running Aggressive Mode of the aformentioned fix, which cleans out this temporary folder.

    Sorry I was late,

    Richard
    Thanks for the come-back!

    In this case, neither SFC nor CheckSUR reported problems, so I was a little at a loss as to how best to approach it - and I really wanted to avoid the inevitable history loss involved in running 50202 in aggressive mode.
    Beggars can't be choosers, though. I'm just happy I had a full set of SP1 standalones already on disk - downloading that amount on a dongle can get expensive, especially when the darn thing decides to change IP half-way through!
    I also try to avoid deleting the history, one of the reasons why I have abandoned that Fix-It as a first post solution, and moved entirely to running it only when evidence points to a fix (e.g. from a CBS.log). I have tried deleting just portions of the SoftwareDistribution folder to preserve the history, and although I have had some success, it has not yet proven to be reliable. However, I have had more success in attempting to fix corruptions inside the SoftwareDistribution folder, but due to time commitments, and lack of availablilty of scanning tools for that folder, I have not yet made that a service, although I do intend to one day.
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21.
Find Us