New
#101
Jon, at this point it sounds like the only thing to try
OK, as a last ditch attempt I just rerun the in-place upgrade, which to my surprise completed successfully seeing as I have attempted it at least 3 times previously all of which failed and reverted my original settings.
Anyway, I have run SURT and SFC, no other applications have been ran. I had to rerun SFC several times due to windows resource protection - is this normal?
If someone wouldn't mine taking a look at the attached logs and letting me know what you think it would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Jon
I don't ever recall seeing anything above around the POQ 300 mark - here's the end of your CBS/SFC log....
Please run another SFC SCANNOW, and post the new log - It should be fascinating!Code:POQ 488 ends. 2013-09-26 18:45:50, Info CSI 00000d12 [SR] Verify complete 2013-09-26 18:45:50, Info CSI 00000d13 [SR] Repairing 1 components 2013-09-26 18:45:50, Info CSI 00000d14 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction 2013-09-26 18:45:51, Info CSI 00000d15 Repair results created: POQ 489 starts: POQ 489 ends. 2013-09-26 18:45:51, Info CSI 00000d16 [SR] Repair complete 2013-09-26 18:45:51, Info CSI 00000d17 [SR] Committing transaction 2013-09-26 18:45:51, Info CSI 00000d18 Creating NT transaction (seq 2), objectname [6]"(null)" 2013-09-26 18:45:51, Info CSI 00000d19 Created NT transaction (seq 2) result 0x00000000, handle @0x159c 2013-09-26 18:45:51, Info CSI 00000d1a@2013/9/26:17:45:51.076 CSI perf trace: CSIPERF:TXCOMMIT;7 2013-09-26 18:45:51, Info CSI 00000d1b [SR] Verify and Repair Transaction completed. All files and registry keys listed in this transaction have been successfully repaired
What are POQ's if you don't mind me asking? I presume they are not good? Sorry, but i'm still new to all of this...
New CBS logs attached.
Jon
That finished on a much more reasonable note :)
I think the POQ can roughly be translated as 'Packet of Queries' - SFC checks files in batches of 100 and works on them before proceeding to the next batch. Each batch is given a consecutive POQ number, but I have no idea how it works out the ordering.Code:POQ 144 ends. 2013-09-26 20:43:30, Info CSI 000003a1 [SR] Verify complete 2013-09-26 20:43:30, Info CSI 000003a2 [SR] Verifying 94 (0x000000000000005e) components 2013-09-26 20:43:30, Info CSI 000003a3 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction 2013-09-26 20:43:32, Info CSI 000003a4 Repair results created: POQ 145 starts: POQ 145 ends. 2013-09-26 20:43:32, Info CSI 000003a5 [SR] Verify complete 2013-09-26 20:43:32, Info CSI 000003a6 [SR] Repairing 0 components 2013-09-26 20:43:32, Info CSI 000003a7 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction 2013-09-26 20:43:32, Info CSI 000003a8 Repair results created: POQ 146 starts: POQ 146 ends. 2013-09-26 20:43:32, Info CSI 000003a9 [SR] Repair complete
It seems that the first run had immense amount of pending transactions to complete, and that the second had very little to do - hence the drop in final POQ from 489 to 146.
Although there's nothing in the standard SFC extract, there is one error in the detailed log that may need attention...
Unfortunately, I can't claim any knowledge as to WTH it means!Code:POQ 27 ends. 2013-09-26 20:34:05, Info CSI 000000d5 [SR] Verify complete 2013-09-26 20:34:05, Info CSI 000000d6 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components 2013-09-26 20:34:05, Info CSI 000000d7 [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction 2013-09-26 20:34:11, Error CSI 000000d8@2013/9/26:19:34:11.433 (F) d:\w7rtm\base\xml\udom_microdom.cpp(3734): Error c000003e [Error,Facility=(system),Code=62 (0x003e)] originated in function MicrodomImplementation::CDomLayoutCache::AdvanceCachedPointer expression: (ulElementType == (0x2)) || (ulElementType == (0x3)) || (ulElementType == (0x5)) || (ulElementType == (0x1)) || (ulElementType == (0x6)) || (ulElementType == (0x7)) || (ulElementType == (0x4)) [gle=0x80004005] 2013-09-26 20:37:16, Info CSI 000000d9 [SR] Verifying 100 (0x0000000000000064) components 2013-09-26 20:37:16, Info CSI 000000da [SR] Beginning Verify and Repair transaction 2013-09-26 20:37:17, Info CSI 000000db Repair results created: POQ 28 starts: POQ 28 ends.
Guessing here, that the fact that the verification stage appears to have restarted, and completed successfully, means that there was a mis-read recognised by the system, which then re-read the affected data and was happy with it.
The rest of the log looks pretty clear.
So what's the next step? Would it be worth running another SFC and checking the results one final time before I re-install all the windows updates?
Jon
Hi Noel,
Please find the CBS logs attached. Somehow I have a feeling you will find a lot more problems, but fingers crossed.
Once you have checked the logs if you could advise on the next steps that would be great.
Jon
OUCH!
There's a fair number of manifest problems - Please run a CheckSUR scan and we'll see what that has to say. You'll need to download the latest version (they updated it a week or so ago)
I'm using Win 7 so do you mean CHKDSK rather than CheckSUR? And where would I download the latest version please?
Jon