Battlefield 3 gaming rig ?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 324
    Windows 8.1 - 64 Bit
       #21

    badger906 said:
    Its not about bragging rights... Its about the height of technology!

    I only play pc games as they push the boundaries of technology and just look great.
    If I wasn't interested in visuals and physics then I'd by it for a console. Fact is I can notice the difference.

    You think its bragging rights.. I think its just your defence for not being able to...

    Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk
    yeah right, I am unable to notice any difference cause the bloody game is not working in UK

    System requirements from game cover:

    Windows vista/7
    2 GHz Dual Core (Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz or Athlon X2 2.7 GHz)
    2 GB RAM
    20GB HDD space
    DVD ROM
    DirectX 10.1 compatible with 512MB RAM (ATI)
    DirectX 10.0 compatible with 512MB RAM (NVIDIA)
    keyboard and mouse
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 1,846
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64, & Mac OS X 10.9.2
       #22

    Yeah my games sat in my office at work! Hoping the servers will be fine when I get home after 6pm!

    Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 324
    Windows 8.1 - 64 Bit
       #23

    badger906 said:
    Yeah my games sat in my office at work! Hoping the servers will be fine when I get home after 6pm!
    we can only hope mate. EA/DICE already got our money and they don't care. I wonder why we;PC gamers; are the only ones who are suffering with this. Console kids can play it fine.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,846
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64, & Mac OS X 10.9.2
       #24

    I paid well over the odd for mine in game! Pre order was £5 and the game was £37.99!!!!!

    I was like your having a giraffe!

    But as my internet is slow, and everytime I've ordered on line its been late, I decided to pay it lol


    Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 7,878
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #25

    Devilz said:
    whats all this about playing game on ultra/high settings. I think its just bragging rights. look at this video and decide, if you are actually playing game, will you notice difference between low/ultra settings?
    I tend to agree, that people are obsessed with having things on ultra when there is really very small differences between low-med-high-ultra.

    If there were massive differences, which made the visuals a night and day difference between medium and ultra...then sure...I would absolutely want things on Ultra as well.

    On my box, I seem to be able to set my settings to Ultra and can move around the maps I have tried just fine. But I've also set my settings to High, and also set them to Medium and I'll be honest...i see VERY LITTLE difference between the two. Because there is practically no difference that I can perceive between Medium and Ultra...I'm more inclined to just stay on Medium to ensure, without question, that I won't get any stuttering or lag. Upgrading isn't a consideration for me, because why spend money on new components to ensure that I can set the slider to Ultra when i really don't see any difference.

    Finally, as a last example, I upgraded my video card from a 9800GTX+ (which could only play on LOW) to a 570GTX. My 9800GTX+ had a problem going full screen with 1920x1080 and was primarily the reason that I replaced it...the second reason was the fact that the fans on my 9800GTX+ were quite loud. But on the times that I could get to full screen on the 9800GTX+ at full screen with low settings it looked great. Once I moved to my 570GTX+, running full screen between High and Ultra practically looked the same visually...it just stuttered less. Am I happy I replaced my video card? Yes. Did it make a noticeable difference in the quality of the graphics...Not really.


    With regards to the comments about stuttering, from what I have read thus far...it seems to me that people running with AMD/ATI video cards are the ones experiencing more issues. A friend of mine with a new 2600k, and an ATI 5870 is having some lag within his game...and I don't see that same issue on my Q9550 with an Nvidia GTX570.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 1,846
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64, & Mac OS X 10.9.2
       #26

    i can play bf3 on ultra with full AA ect with frames to spare. new pc was worth it
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 324
    Windows 8.1 - 64 Bit
       #27

    badger906 said:
    i can play bf3 on ultra with full AA ect with frames to spare. new pc was worth it
    Can you tell how did you activated game on origin cause I'm struggling with it big time
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 1,846
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64, & Mac OS X 10.9.2
       #28

    i just stuck my cd in, it asked to install origin so i did, it then asked for my battlefield 3 cd key, i typed that in and it installed, followed by a 470mb update (grr took ages on my 1.6mbps) and then just played lol.

    only issue im having is my my second scroll wheel on my cyborg mouse doesnt seem to work with it. ive mapped the macro with left control and Z so when i roll it one way i should duck, and prone the other way.. but it only works like once in every 10 attempts!...
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 324
    Windows 8.1 - 64 Bit
       #29

    Lucky mate, I'm giving it one more try, if it doesn't work its going back for refund.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 3,822
    Windows10 Pro - 64Bit vs.10547
       #30

    BF3's running like a bleedin' train on mine - flawless..

    make sure to get the latest CAP from AMD
    new gfx drivers will be around on Monday - yippee!!

    - absolutely brilliant on ULTRA settings
      My Computer


 
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17.
Find Us