Hi there I too was weaned on Red Hat and liked it but when it went all corporate I needed something else.
Yeah, my training, all of my documentation, my books and my certifications are in RedHat Linux....hence my desire to stick with it. Don't get me wrong, there is nothing inherently wrong with SuSE, I was just mentioning to Seeker that when dealing with Linux distros, you are always going to find good and bad. You cannot rule out a distro just because you read some bad things about it.
I never liked Fedora which people say is based on Red Hat -
Yeah, it's the "free" version of RedHat more or less. It's bleeding edge, running the latest version of everything...even if not completely ready for prime time. Updates come fast and furious and can sometimes lead to fairly broken systems when complete. As a desktop, Fedora is far from my favorite, because I strongly prefer stable and proven over the absolute latest version.
I think with Linux -- just choose what works best for you -- and what you need it for. I'm sure if you have to support servers at work etc then something like Red Hat will be liked by most professionals. However I really dont need an Enterprise quality product .
Oh yeah, absolutely agree, all of these distros are geared towards specific tasks and some do better jobs than others. Since I run products on lots and lots of Linux servers, a long support life and safe/stable updates are priority number 1. The trade-off is that we usually aren't on the latest version of php or mysql server...but in the event those specific newer versions are needed, you can always download and install from source manually.
but maybe I'm too used to anything dealing with Linux to be FREE. However I'm tempted to try Red Hat again just to see what's new in the years since I last used it.
If that's what you want to do, you can get a "trial" of RHEL for free. But I'd highly suggest instead using CentOS linux. It's based directly on the SRPM's for RHEL, it's just recompiled and trademarked images and logos have been removed. For all intents and purposes, it's "free" Red Hat Enterprise Linux. CentOS is what I use on all of my production Linux servers. Like you, we are looking for free, and don't need the phone support from RedHat to manage our own products. Thus, we went with a free enterprise class OS like CentOS and since it's pretty much "exactly" like Red Hat, everything I know, and all of my documentation work flawlessly.
The idea of using a Virtual appliance however was basically to save all the trouble of installing the Guest OS - especially if you are new to Linux.
Yeah, I always cringe when I read a post about somebody who wants to "dual boot with Linux" and isn't using a virtual machine or virtual appliance.