IE10: Fast, Fluid, Perfect for Touch, and Available Now for Windows 7

[sygnus21]

IE 10 not compability with my machine
I run Microsoft windows 7 ultimate

Windows 7 is Windows 7. Anyways you must have SP1 installed.

System requirements - Internet Explorer 10 Release Preview system requirements

 

[NoN]

Enabling 'Enhanced Protected Mode' causes the browser to run in 64-bit mode by default which is pretty cool as well, although it breaks the PDF Helper Plugin.

Which I did also and true it does breaks some adobe shockwave and pdf helper plugin in the browser.
Just a click onto the warning box to desactivate for the web site visited then it runs fine, and looks reset to default after closing the browser.

Yes it is faster, humm...around 1 second faster than IE9 to load, which is good.

Enhanced Protected Mode in CP=>Internet Options=> Advanced Tab=>Security settings.

 

[AddRAM]

Could someone who has installed IE10 please post a shot of an open page so we can see what it looks like, Thanks

And if you do install it, can it simply be uninstalled through add/remove programs ?

 

[derekimo]

And if you do install it, can it simply be uninstalled through add/remove programs ?

You can uninstall it in the view installed updates of windows update.

 

[Lavixgne]

IE 10 not compability with my machine
I run Microsoft windows 7 ultimate

Probably because you don't have SP1,should install as long as you have SP1 installed.

As for ie10, i'm having no issues what so ever and atm is my default browser since like I said in a earlier post, more responsive then firefox.

yap..thank

 

[Britton30]

Could someone who has installed IE10 please post a shot of an open page so we can see what it looks like, Thanks

I'd like to see one too.

 

[sygnus21]

It looks like any normal open page. What are you looking for???

 

[Wordsworth]

I tried IE10 for several days and at first it seemed faster, but then seem to slow until the speed was excruciatingly slow in loading pages. Constantly seeing Waiting for...messages in the tab area. Some pages were so slow I thought I'd gone back to the dial-up access days. Got tired of dealing with it and reinstalled IE9 through View installed updates feature in Programs and Features app. IE9 loads pages in the time you can snap your fingers.

IE 10 is buggy to say the least at least within the synergy of my system. If they're going to have the official release very soon I may wait awhile to try it again, although install and uninstall is a breeze.

 

[Britton30]

It looks like any normal open page. What are you looking for???

View attachment 242223

View attachment 242227

Tweaks, new buttons, icons, etc. Fairly ordinary it looks like. From IE8 to IE 9 there was a difference in looks. Thanks.

 

[sygnus21]

It looks like any normal open page. What are you looking for???

View attachment 242223

View attachment 242227

Tweaks, new buttons, icons, etc. Fairly ordinary it looks like. From IE8 to IE 9 there was a difference in looks. Thanks.

Nope. Looks just like IE9 to me but faster. I guess the difference is in the inner workings.

Anyway I plan on sticking with it as I still haven't found a reason not to. I haven't found a single problem yet.

 

[JerometheGiraff]

FireFox 16 crashes too much, it appears the browser war is now between Google and Microsoft. What happened FireFox, unless they plan on coming back in the near future.

 

[AddRAM]

It looks like any normal open page. What are you looking for???

View attachment 242223

View attachment 242227

We meant what IE10 looks like, not a webpage. persay.
Thank You for posting the pic.

 

[AddRAM]

FireFox 16 crashes too much, it appears the browser war is now between Google and Microsoft. What happened FireFox, unless they plan on coming back in the near future.

Try this, although I don`t use it.

Waterfox - The fastest 64-bit variant of Firefox on the web

 

[RoasterMen]

I'm still for FireFox xD

 

[Wordsworth]

Nope. Looks just like IE9 to me but faster. I guess the difference is in the inner workings.

Anyway I plan on sticking with it as I still haven't found a reason not to. I haven't found a single problem yet.

Wish I could say the same. I really have no idea as of yet why the performance deteriorated. I first thought there were problems with my ISP, but after several days of dealing with the problems and then reinstalling IE9, I know it was IE10. I'll install IE10 final when it becomes available and see what happens.

 

[JerometheGiraff]

IE10 is fast, I'm hesitant to switch, but at the rate firefox is going it seems best. I'm surprised with Microsoft, they did it.

 

[lehnerus2000]

Firefox + NoScript for me

No selective script blocking, no go.

Pointless feature as nobody pays attention to the header.

It's worse than that according to Ed Bott.

Summary: As a consumer, you'd think that the meaning of "Do Not Track" is pretty clear. But the big data-collecting companies that are behind this standard seem intent on making sure it does nothing at all.

ZDNet
Why Do Not Track is worse than a miserable failure | ZDNet

​

FireFox 16 crashes too much, it appears the browser war is now between Google and Microsoft.

Strange.
Mine only crashes ~1/fortnight during shut down (on W7).
I have 7 different FF profiles in my W7 install (and my 20+ VMs all have their own FF profiles).

It is twitchy in my XP install though.

Have you tried creating a new user profile (for Firefox, not Windows)?

 

[JerometheGiraff]

No selective script blocking, no go.

Pointless feature as nobody pays attention to the header.

It's worse than that according to Ed Bott.

Summary: As a consumer, you'd think that the meaning of "Do Not Track" is pretty clear. But the big data-collecting companies that are behind this standard seem intent on making sure it does nothing at all.

ZDNet
Why Do Not Track is worse than a miserable failure | ZDNet

​

FireFox 16 crashes too much, it appears the browser war is now between Google and Microsoft.

Strange.
Mine only crashes ~1/fortnight during shut down (on W7).
I have 7 different FF profiles in my W7 install (and my 20+ VMs all have their own FF profiles).

It is twitchy in my XP install though.

Have you tried creating a new user profile (for Firefox, not Windows)?

The other day FireFox 17 was released, I'm hoping that irons out some of the problems.

 

[chev65]

A couple things I noticed that IE 10 can't do.

It will not allow me to update my routers firmware when using IE10 but IE9 still works for this. Obviously this is for security reasons but none the less we need to be able to do these things with our browsers.

IE10 also does not allow me to run my .gws file which is a router settings file to restore all router settings with. I have to use IE9 for this also.

These are standard files for router maintenance yet for some reason Msoft has left us out in the cold here.
I did mess with the security setting to no avail.

 

[sygnus21]

A couple things I noticed that IE 10 can't do.

It will not allow me to update my routers firmware when using IE10 but IE9 still works for this. Obviously this is for security reasons but none the less we need to be able to do these things with our browsers.

Hmmm... haven't tried that one yet. Which router brand do you have? I've got a Linksys E3000. My firmware is currently updated to the latest version so I can't test this the update side.

Thanks for the info.