The BIG browser benchmark (January 2013 edition)

[Brink]

It has only been a couple of months since the last Big Browser Benchmark but there has been enough changes to warrant a re-running the tests. There's also a new benchmark test to put the browsers through their paces.

Let's pit the leading browsers against four of the toughest benchmark tests available to see which one is triumphant. Here are the browsers that will be put through their paces:

•Chrome 24
•Chrome 23 (left in the listing for comparison with newer release)
•Firefox 18
•Firefox 16 (left in the listing for comparison with newer release)
•Opera 12
•Internet Explorer 9 (32-bit)
•Internet Explorer 10 (32-bit)
•Safari 5
​

Here are the tests that the browsers will face:

•SunSpider JavaScript 0.9.1: A JavaScript benchmark developed by Apple's WebKit team in 2007 with a focus on real-world problem solving;
•V8 Benchmark Suite: A pure JavaScript benchmark used by Google to tune the V8 JavaScript engine;
•Peacekeeper: FutureMark's JavaScript test which stress-tests features such as animation, navigation, forms and other commonly utilized tasks;
•Kraken 1.0: Another JavaScript benchmark developed by Mozilla. This is based on SunSpider but features crucial benchmarking enhancements;
•RoboHornet: A Google-led open-source browser benchmark.
•Octane: Google's new benchmark, based on the V8 test suite.
​

All testing carried out on a Windows 7 (32-bit) machine, running a P8600 2.4GHz dual-core processor, 4GB RAM, and an NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics card.

Read more at source:
The BIG browser benchmark (January 2013 edition) | ZDNet

 

[x BlueRobot]

Opera did quite well considering it's not a very well-known or used browser.

 

[Solarstarshines]

Opera did quite well considering it's not a very well-known or used browser.

it has minor issues like loading whole pages with out missing links sometimes ( not a deal breaker btw) and flash issues but hey I can say it is way better then Firefox hands down

Most of the time it is on point which is very good for me

 

[Cr00zng]

The MS way of testing browsers is the Mendelbrot explorer, available at this link:

Mandelbrot Explorer

The non-siectific results of testing my PC with different browsers...

Firefox v.18.0: 51,777,896 iterations in 1.94 seconds
Opera v.12.12: 51,777,896 iterations in 5.57 seconds
IE v.9.0: 51,777,896 iterations in 22.76 seconds

Nice benchmark MS...

 

[gigagiggles]

The non-siectific results of testing my PC with different browsers...

Firefox v.18.0: 51,777,896 iterations in 1.94 seconds
Opera v.12.12: 51,777,896 iterations in 5.57 seconds
IE v.9.0: 51,777,896 iterations in 22.76 seconds

PaleMoonx64 v15.4: 51,777,896 iterations in 2.42 seconds

 

[kado897]

Chrome 25.0.1364.36 beta-m: 51,777,896 iterations in 1.43 seconds

 

[Urthboundmisfit]

Nice benchmark MS...

You can't make this stuff up...
View attachment 251303

 

[gigagiggles]

Waterfox 18.0.1 (64bit version of Firefox): 51,777,896 iterations in 2.18 seconds

 

[Andreas W]

IE10 32 bit 51,777,896 iterations in 2.60 seconds

 

[MadSupra354]

When are Microsoft going to release IE 10 RTW on Windows 7?
Anyway, my results:

 

[IML8]

I've been trying out the IE 10 RC and it seems to be working perfectly.

 

[IML8]

As an experiment, I loaded Firefox portable into a RamDisk:



Pretty darned good, but not impressive enough to write home about. Then again, I wonder if this is just limited by my mediocre internet speed.