Solved What still-supported browser (w/ a GUI) uses the least amount of RAM?

hiatus1

New member
Local time
6:03 PM
Messages
13
Hi all,

Machine has 512mb of RAM and Windows 7 Starter. In need of a GUI browser that uses the least RAM and is still supported/updated/maintained - any ideas?

Thanks
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 StarterIntel Atom Z510512mbIntel GMA 500
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Kohjinsha
OS
Windows 7 Starter
CPU
Intel Atom Z510
Memory
512mb
Graphics Card(s)
Intel GMA 500
I agree that you'll have a very hard time finding a good browser that can run on such a little RAM. In fact I'm pretty sure Windows 7 itself will struggle running on only 512MB RAM (certainly possible, but expect lots of disk-trashing pagefile activity).

I think your best option is to try to upgrade RAM, or sacrifice some of your requirements. Or simply accept the performance hit and go to a current browser.

Consider that most RAM usage comes not from the browser itself, but from the webpages it opens and the code they contain. Nowadays websites simply assume greater resources and won't economize memory.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Ultimate x64Intel Core i7-740QM8 GB DDR3NVIDIA GeForce 330GT
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Toshiba Sattelite A665-S6092
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-740QM
Memory
8 GB DDR3
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce 330GT
Screen Resolution
1366x768
Hard Drives
Samsung 840 SSD 500GB
1TB USB3 external HD
Cooling
Coolermaster Notepal U3 notebook cooling pad
Internet Speed
3mbps ASDL
Antivirus
ClamWin 0.98.7
Browser
Opera 12.17 x86 (main), Firefox 38 (sec), IE11 (last resort)
That is a tall order and not very practical.

Modern browsers, at least those I am familiar with, tend to favor performance, functionality and stability. They have gone the multi-process route which has a number of advantages, but low memory usage is not one of them. The need to run with limited resources imposes restrictions on developers which would put their products at a disadvantage against others. Systems with only 512 MB RAM is too small a market to bother with.

At one time the Opera browser worked well with limited resources but that is no more. Modern versions have gone the multi-process route with all it brings. In terms of memory usage it is probably no better than most others. The Palemoon browser is based on an old version of Firefox before it went multi-process. It uses less memory but you could question if it is a truly modern browser. It works well for me but that is with 4 GB RAM.

I have used Palemoon on a trial version of Server 2008 R2 on a virtual machine assigned as little as 800 MB RAM. Even then it struggles. With 512 MB RAM it would be much worse. But a server was never intended to run web browsers. Windows 7 starter would be better but with 512 MB RAM it will struggle.

For better performance you will likely have to go with an older unsupported browser. But they do tend to have issues with modern websites.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Pro 64 bitXeon W35208 GBNvidia Geforce 210
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP
OS
Windows 7 Pro 64 bit
CPU
Xeon W3520
Memory
8 GB
Graphics Card(s)
Nvidia Geforce 210
Thanks all, it would seem that what I wish for is something that simply does not exist. Will be ending this thread here.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 StarterIntel Atom Z510512mbIntel GMA 500
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Kohjinsha
OS
Windows 7 Starter
CPU
Intel Atom Z510
Memory
512mb
Graphics Card(s)
Intel GMA 500
Thanks all, it would seem that what I wish for is something that simply does not exist. Will be ending this thread here.

Go to Majorgeeks, search for K-Meleon. Also has a John Haller PortableApps version, I run it on this machine [for practice] and the PVR/DVR which still uses Windows XPPro because one of the legacy TV tuners has no Win7 or later drivers. Not directly compatible with Gekko, so you'll have to migrate all your logins and passwords into its' manager by hand, one by one.
The good news is, the tabs are still on the bottom, below the navigation bar, after all these years.
Here...I did it for you;
Download K-Meleon - MajorGeeks
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

W7 Ultimate 32-bit
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
W7 Ultimate 32-bit
Motherboard
ASUS M4N68T-M V2
PSU
Seasonic G-series 650W, can't afford the X,still Top/Line.
Case
Cooler Master Storm Scout 2, Ghost White version.
Cooling
5 fans....no liquid needed, everything under 100F
Keyboard
veteran PS2
Mouse
veteran PS2
Internet Speed
50Mps
Antivirus
AVG 2016 + TinyWall-to enhance Windows 7 firewall.
Browser
several

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

W7 Ultimate 32-bit
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
W7 Ultimate 32-bit
Motherboard
ASUS M4N68T-M V2
PSU
Seasonic G-series 650W, can't afford the X,still Top/Line.
Case
Cooler Master Storm Scout 2, Ghost White version.
Cooling
5 fans....no liquid needed, everything under 100F
Keyboard
veteran PS2
Mouse
veteran PS2
Internet Speed
50Mps
Antivirus
AVG 2016 + TinyWall-to enhance Windows 7 firewall.
Browser
several
Hi,

K-Meleon really does seem to be the lightest/quickest GUI web browser for windows. Have found the Goanna edition opens strangely slow when tried on multiple different devices, but the Gecko edition opens fine.

I will however be continuing my search. There is lighter yet. Thanks all.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 StarterIntel Atom Z510512mbIntel GMA 500
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Kohjinsha
OS
Windows 7 Starter
CPU
Intel Atom Z510
Memory
512mb
Graphics Card(s)
Intel GMA 500
Hi,

K-Meleon really does seem to be the lightest/quickest GUI web browser for windows. Have found the Goanna edition opens strangely slow when tried on multiple different devices, but the Gecko edition opens fine.

I will however be continuing my search. There is lighter yet. Thanks all.


Well then, Majorgeeks and PortableApps are the best places to search, pick a "flavour" that you like.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

W7 Ultimate 32-bit
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Custom Build
OS
W7 Ultimate 32-bit
Motherboard
ASUS M4N68T-M V2
PSU
Seasonic G-series 650W, can't afford the X,still Top/Line.
Case
Cooler Master Storm Scout 2, Ghost White version.
Cooling
5 fans....no liquid needed, everything under 100F
Keyboard
veteran PS2
Mouse
veteran PS2
Internet Speed
50Mps
Antivirus
AVG 2016 + TinyWall-to enhance Windows 7 firewall.
Browser
several
Hi,

K-Meleon really does seem to be the lightest/quickest GUI web browser for windows. Have found the Goanna edition opens strangely slow when tried on multiple different devices, but the Gecko edition opens fine.

I will however be continuing my search. There is lighter yet. Thanks all.

the gecko edition of K-meleon is discontinued and is no longer being updated. the goanna edition of K-meleon, on the other hand, gets updated weekly




edit - also check these sites:


Comparison of lightweight web browsers - Wikipedia

10 best lightweight browsers for Windows PCs

The 5 Lightest Web Browsers – March 2021
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 SP1 Home Premium 64bit [x64]Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz6 GBIntel HD Graphics 2000
Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Dell Inspiron 620
OS
Windows 7 SP1 Home Premium 64bit [x64]
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz
Memory
6 GB
Graphics Card(s)
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Sound Card
Conexant CX20641 HD Audio
Hard Drives
Western Digital 1TB (1024GB) WD10EALX-759BA1
Internet Speed
Spectrum Cable Internet up to 100Mbps
Why multi-processes instead of letting a multi-core processor do the job? Isn't that similar??
 

My Computers My Computers

  • At a glance

    Win7 x64AMD
    Computer type
    Laptop
    Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
    Toshiba
    OS
    Win7 x64
    CPU
    AMD
  • At a glance

    Win 7 Pro x64AMD FX-835016GBnVidia GeForce 1060
    Computer type
    PC/Desktop
    System Manufacturer/Model Number
    AMD based MB
    OS
    Win 7 Pro x64
    CPU
    AMD FX-8350
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte GA-970A-D3P
    Memory
    16GB
    Graphics Card(s)
    nVidia GeForce 1060
    Monitor(s) Displays
    25"
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1200
    Hard Drives
    two SSD;
    two 4TB HDD
    PSU
    700watt Seasonic
    Internet Speed
    300MB up & down
    Browser
    Firefox
    Other Info
    BD Recorder
Why multi-processes instead of letting a multi-core processor do the job? Isn't that similar??

No, not even close, they're separate concepts :p

A multi core processor (like every single one you can get since 15 years ago or more) need code to specifically target such multi core capability, otherwise newer CPU is just a faster single core one. Windows already includes lots of multithreading code in its kernel and will easily make programs share multiple cores without them even knowing about it.
But for a single specific program to make full use of multiple CPU cores, the program needs to use multiple threa of execution. Threads are the most basic execution units of operating systems and basically each thread takes one CPU core to run. The OS then switches all existing threads to share the CPU among programs and among different parts of the same program. Each process has at least one thread and it can have as many as it wants.

Any particular program can fully utilize multiple cores of the CPU by running multiple processes or multiple threads within a single process, it's pretty much the same from that aspect. But without using either, any program is constrained to a single core, the CPU doesn't magically knows how to split the load.

Now, back to the topic, the reason for the multiprocess architecture of browsers (started by Chrome, then copied by Internet Explorer, and lastly Firefox) is NOT performance, that can be achieved by using threads, way more efficiently BTW.

The real reason for the multiprocess design flaw is security. Threads within the same process have full access to the complete memory and other resources of the process. Chrome (and all others after it) run one process per tab, which means that the each tab has NO access to the internals of others. The same with plugins and other components.
What this achieves in practice is that a bug in the browser won't expose secrets accidentally, or an hostile plugin won't have an easy way tampering with the whole thing, because separate processes have OS-level isolation and needs dedicated communication chanels.

In terms of performance it's actually worse than the normal approach. Communications between processes is slower than within a process, and separate processes consume additional resources, including building their internal environment for each one. They do use the full CPU cores, very much in the same way you can achieve with threads, though, but that's a side effect.
 

My Computer My Computer

At a glance

Windows 7 Ultimate x64Intel Core i7-740QM8 GB DDR3NVIDIA GeForce 330GT
Computer type
Laptop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Toshiba Sattelite A665-S6092
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Core i7-740QM
Memory
8 GB DDR3
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce 330GT
Screen Resolution
1366x768
Hard Drives
Samsung 840 SSD 500GB
1TB USB3 external HD
Cooling
Coolermaster Notepal U3 notebook cooling pad
Internet Speed
3mbps ASDL
Antivirus
ClamWin 0.98.7
Browser
Opera 12.17 x86 (main), Firefox 38 (sec), IE11 (last resort)
Back
Top