New
#1571
...provided the partion that was imaged was aligned before. If that partition was sourced from a HDD, the image is most likely not aligned.A Macrium image restore can also do the alignment job.
...provided the partion that was imaged was aligned before. If that partition was sourced from a HDD, the image is most likely not aligned.A Macrium image restore can also do the alignment job.
Numbers indicative of an Intel 335, I got about a month ago for apps, running on a SATA II mobo. Since the system does what I want it to, won't be upgrading the mobo simply to get full performance from the drive.
I would not bother upgrading the mobo. The access times will most likely not change and the data transfer rates are of a lesser importance. The difference would only show in the measurements but have very little impact on real life performance.
Hum I think I might have a problem and I know this is probably not the place to post this but my SSD has slowed but if you look at the two speed tests in the pics there is a noticeable difference which I have no answer for.
I think it's fine John and the difference attributed to the data each program uses for their tests. Here is mine for a 840 Pro with Rapid Mode enabled.
It's the access time that's important, and yours is less than 0.1ms, so that's very good.
(BTW, I think if you click on "Sprache" is AS SSD you can change it to display English.)
Gary is right. Only if you compare measurements with the same program you will get an apples to apples comparison. Different programs can show widely different results.
Here's mine. What do the results mean? (MY CPU is an intel i5, and my MB is ASUS. P7P55D-E LX, should this matter).