New
#20
MS has totally dropped the ball in their own PR and marketing on this issue. Their own blogs/forums and press releases cannot/will not define the difference between a technical "In-Place" (Dirty) upgrade versus a "Clean" install and an "Upgrade License" versus a "Full License" and how the terms and definitions interact.
If the MS document Swarfega provides a copy of in the first post (available from MS's own site) is explaining "In-Place" (Dirty) upgrade paths, then it is stating that Vista Home Premium can, technically, be "In-Place" upgraded to W7 Home Premium and W7 Ultimate BUT NOT W7 PRO?
That makes NO sense logically from a technical point.
I assume that a CLEAN INSTALL is ALWAYS an OPTION. Or is that also too technically logical?
If the document is supposed to be an UPGRADE LICENSE path, again it makes no sense. Vista Home Premium LICENSE can be UPGRADED to a W7 Home Premium License OR a W7 Ultimate License? MS has NOT offered any W7 Ultimate Upgrade LICENSE, have they?
The document appears to not explain either a Technical Upgrade path or a License Upgrade path with any consistency to itself and contradicts previous statements contained in other MS publications and blog/forum posts.
It only adds to the confusion as illustrated by the questions from the above SevenForums Posters.
I have watched as a thread on a Technet Forum was closed because of confusion created by this same issue and an MS Representative could not sort out the confusion either.
Based on MS's poor communication skills and explanations to date I am leery that nobody will know for sure until the Upgrade Kit boxes are on the shelves.
Come on MS! Get your sh*t together on this and don't screw the pooch!